Moderators: tsherkin, rsavaj, TASTIC


justinb80 wrote:I would assume that if Amare just walks, you could look for the Suns to get in on the free agent action, particularly for a more mid-level FA like Rudy Gay. I think they'd be in the lottery, but not quite the cellar.

-SDU- wrote:suns will target (but never get) wade
if amare goes we will just use capspace to pursue another FA
its quite well thought that the suns arent as high on amare as he is on himself



Sun Scorched wrote:Frye has a player option. If I were the Suns I would encourage him and his agent to take the option after which we would sign him to an extension, call it 2 years at such and such. That way we retain the flexibility to pursue a quality FA in 2010. If Frye is smart, he'll know where his bread is buttered.
Lou won't cost a lot to retain, my guess would be we could sign him for something similar to the bi-annual exception.
In terms of Amare:
Situation One
Amare walks. Not terrible, not ideal. It frees up some cap space and we can easily attract a mid-level talent with the amount of playing time we would have to offer combined with the ability to play with one of the best distributors in the game.
Situation Two
We're honest with Amare and we tell him we are not interested in signing him to a max contract and then ask him which teams he would prefer to play with. We then attempt to structure a S&T with his preferences so that: a.) he can retain his Bird rights and recieve a contract similar to what we could give him and, b.) we can get expirings and a pick or two for our good faith effort.
Situation Two would have essentially the same effect as One, with the added benefit of landing Amare in one of Chicago, New York or South Beach and receiving picks and a young piece or two in return.
Send Amare (again, S&T) to one of (x team) and receive:
New York
Larry Hughes, Wilson Chandler, pick(s)
or
David Lee (S&T), Wilson Chandler, pick(s)![]()
Chicago
Brad Miller, Tyrus Thomas, pick(s)
Miami
Quentin Richardson, Udonis Haslem, Mario Chalmers/Dequan Cook, pick(s)

Sreister wrote:
I've never thought of it before, but your option 2 actually sounds pretty legit. I'm not sold on all the drama he causes and the pre-modonna statements he make and I think the organization looks at that, as well as his history of injuries that will hang over his head for quite a while.
The way I look at it, is that Amare will continue to come out with guns blazing and turn some heads. This really bodes well for us for 2 reasons.
1.) He raises his own stock
2.) Teams come to grips that the FA class isn't going to be there (a la Budget constraints and FA's resigning with their respective teams) and decided to trade picks and whatnot for solid players (Amare)
Both of these really help in getting the most of out Amare, assuming we want to, of course.
As for trades, NY would be a kinda perfect option, they don't have a lot of quality players that we would want, but assuming they don't grab a playoff spot, they're looking at the lottery, and a pretty decent pick at that. So we could get their pick, Chandler, and throw someone else in there and I'd say that's a pretty solid core to rebuild with.

WTFsunsFTW wrote:What do Golden State tears taste like?


Kerrsed wrote:Sreister wrote:
I've never thought of it before, but your option 2 actually sounds pretty legit. I'm not sold on all the drama he causes and the pre-modonna statements he make and I think the organization looks at that, as well as his history of injuries that will hang over his head for quite a while.
The way I look at it, is that Amare will continue to come out with guns blazing and turn some heads. This really bodes well for us for 2 reasons.
1.) He raises his own stock
2.) Teams come to grips that the FA class isn't going to be there (a la Budget constraints and FA's resigning with their respective teams) and decided to trade picks and whatnot for solid players (Amare)
Both of these really help in getting the most of out Amare, assuming we want to, of course.
As for trades, NY would be a kinda perfect option, they don't have a lot of quality players that we would want, but assuming they don't grab a playoff spot, they're looking at the lottery, and a pretty decent pick at that. So we could get their pick, Chandler, and throw someone else in there and I'd say that's a pretty solid core to rebuild with.
Utah owns NY's 1st round pick next year.![]()
Lee would be great. Nate would be great (i just pissed off half the Suns board). Chandler would be great. Thats about all i would take from NY.
Deng/Thomas/Hienrich/Draft picks are all we could really get from CHI. Deng would be great. Thomas might be a good fit in our system (and it seems he is at odds with CHI FO). If we made a move trading JRICH or Barbosa else where, Kirk would be nice to bring off the bench.
I could see Amare reaking havoc on the league with Wade in MIA. But i am not to thrilled with what we could get in return. They will hold on to Chalmers. He is their primary PG. Arroyo might be good.
Dirk is a unrestricted FA with a ETO next year. What are the chances we get Nash to talk him into switching to a Suns Uni? Nash/JRICH/Hill/Dirk/???? With Dirk on the team we need a banger/rebounder (aka not Frye). Maybe Lopez rounds out.
ginobiliflops wrote:Amar'e won't walk.


WTFsunsFTW wrote:What do Golden State tears taste like?

joelinnen wrote:You can have kobe for Stoudemire, Marion , and Nash. anything les the Lakers will Laugh.
Lane1974 wrote:GameTime_3 wrote:Will Steve Nash ever get old?
no, he's like a fine wine or Heather Locklear
