Moderators: BrooklynBulls, Morten Jensen, TB#1, Tommy Udo 6 , Ben B., CellarDoor, dougthonus

Kyben36 wrote:John Henson

No. Thank YOU, Pat. R.I.P.pdenninggolden wrote:Thank you, P4P, for this beautiful and heartfelt tribute. It made me cry and smile.

back_like_crack wrote:its poor education to say a player not expected to be a contributor off of not going top 5 or 10

back_like_crack wrote:its poor education to say a player not expected to be a contributor off of not going top 5 or 10


I can see them trading Tyrus for an expiring (ideally a serviceable forward) and a pick, but those are pretty specific parameters and you may not be able to get this done. No way they include Salmons or Kirk for more cap space...they need those guys.Chi town wrote:- So do the Bulls trade Tyrus this season? Tyrus plus a contract like Salmons or Kirk to clear even more cap with some young talent or picks coming back our way?
Cap space isn't "nothing" if you intend to spend it on talent, which is what the Bulls will do.- Let Tyrus walk for nothing ie Gordon last summer?
Don't know, but since2. If Tyrus goes and we get no bigs in return what do we do next season at PF if Boozer, Amare, or Bosh don't come via FA?
they really just have to find someone better than Gibson to improve themselves.- Taj is not the answer long term next to Noah.
Be nice, but I'm not counting on it.- Personally I think Wade will come to CHI via FA
An epic understatement- IMO we need a better starting PF than Taj if we want to win titles.
Agree, and this is where you may need to trade Hinrich and/or Salmons.- Unless Taj turns into PJ Brown this season and JJ turns into Al Harrington there will have to be trades next summer somewhere


sco wrote:Bulls tweets this year remind me of my high school Shakespeare:Macbeth wrote:And then is heard no more: it is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing

coldfish wrote:Every time I see someone write that they want Wade in Chicago, I have to point out what a waste that would be of talent. That is, unless Rose really isn't that good and you are OK with trading him. Quite frankly, Hinrich is the perfect PG to put next to Wade and they are roughly the same age.
People just don't want to read this, but if you get Wade, trade Rose for the best possible PF.
Hinrich, Wade, Deng, good PF, Noah >>>>>>>>>> Rose, Wade, Deng, no PF, Noah


boogydown wrote:
Coldfish,
It really depends how you put Wade on our team. Wade would work in this scenario
Rose
Wade
3PT shooting SF - John Salmons
3PT shooting PF - Al Harrington - via Kirk Hinrich or Luol Deng
Big Center - Kaman - via Luol Deng or Kirk Hinrich
I can understand where you're going with this, but you simply cannot pass on Wade.
