^ (See below quote)
badonkadonkdonk wrote:the reason we didn't pick brandon is probably based on his mindset and i can totally respect that. maybe jennings isn't crazy and it's just some swagger mentality, but walsh isn't in a position to gamble.
hill looks like a solid prospect, so he went the "safe" way.
i don't buy the missing scouting either... he's saying that to justifiy
I also wasn't sure about Jennings mentality (seemed arrogant and Marbury-ish), but I felt Jennings and Derozan maybe had the highest potential for the players likely available in the Knicks draft range (5-10). I wasn't sure about Derozan's ball-handling and shooting, but if both players "put it together" then they will be very good starters in this league in the future. Still I don't think Jennings is a Mike D'Antoni type PG. While he does pass (flashy passing), he doesn't have a pass-first mentality. Rubio was/is more of a D'Antoni point guard, and maybe even Curry (who is shot happy, but also is very good at finding open teammates). I think the Knicks had eyed Curry and Rubio, and when they were gone they stopped looking for PGs, and then just decided to the BPA/Highest-Rated Player Available (on their draft board). I'm satisfied with the Hill pick (similar to my feelings about the Frye pick). I think a 'young floor-running big with a solid mid range jumper, who is solid inside finisher, is active on the boards, and is able to challenge shots' filled just as big of a need for New York as adding a 'shoot-first PG' in this draft. It will likely take him at least 3 years to get accustom to the league and show his full range of skills. The game in 90% mental, and that's what he needs to improve on, he has all the tools otherwise. I'm hoping he is able to put it together, while still on the Knicks.
I'll be pissed if Walsh didn't pick Jennings or Derozan, and ends up trading Hill just to move Curry and/or Jeffries. If they Knicks are able to sign two MAX player next offseason, both he and fans will be able to justify it, but think Walsh needs to move Curry and Jeffries separately on their own merits (meaning no additional assets should be included). Curry straight up for an expiring, and Jeffries straight up for an expiring. Considering the picks Isiah gave up to get Eddy, and considering the inside presence he is (when in shape and motivated), the Knicks, at minimum, should be able to cut their losses and trade him for a combination of scrubs on smaller expirings. Jeffries' value should at least be enough to get you a lesser player on an expiring contract player-for-player swap. His contract is expiring at the end of next season, it's not like he'll have 3 or 4 more years on his deal. NY probably wouldn't be able to trade with any of the other teams with big cap space in 2010, but they could deal with teams that's trying to cut salary for 2011. Both Curry and Jeffries become assets after this year, but NY can't afford to wait.
Sorry for the side tangent, but it had to be said. As for LeBron, I thought is was sort of strange for him to talk to both Douglas and Gallinari (both player to figure to be on the Knicks after this year) during/after the game, but ultimately I don't think it shows his hand on what he's going to do next off-season.... but it was encouraging to see that as a Knick fan. If James did come I would hate if he was looking over a Jay-Z every game, I would grow tired of those antics. Not even Nate does that. In the playoffs after making a big play maybe, but not every home game.