RealGM 4th Annual User Mock Draft Comments/Trade Discussion

Post #1 » by **J.Kim** » Mon Apr 2, 2007 1:19 am

Okay... the last one was just getting flat out rediculous. So I'm making a new sign up. Rules are essentially the same, except that now, I'll be a lot more stricter in judging the trade's credibility (As in I'll actually be doing research for every team to see who's on the block).

As well, for sign ups, I am going to try to make this so that posters who have knowledge of that team will be picking for the teams. (In the case of teams like ... I don't know... Houston, where there aren't really any fans on this board, I'm gonna go with a veteran poster on this board, rather than a random)

Rules are still the same.

8 Hour time period for picks will still be heavily enforced (If you can't get your picks on time, send your pre-picked choices to me)
Trades and Draft Picks, be realistic as possible.

Arizona - studcrackers
Atlanta - lpsevier
Baltimore - NubekIL
Buffalo - Next Coming
Carolina
Cincinnati - Monkeyfeng06
Cleveland - Smooth32
Chicago
Dallas - The Dallas Mavericks Board
Denver
Detroit - ajaX82
Green Bay - captain_cheapseats
Houston - westthebest
Indianapolis - PacersRule07
Jacksonville - Latrell
Kansas City - Dry_Fish
Miami - its game time
Minnesota - Clincher
New England - sunshinekids99
New Orleans - NO-KG-AI
New York Jets - Manhattan Project
New York Giants - Starksfor3
Oakland -
Philadelphia - philbe311
Pittsburgh
San Diego - PhilipNelsonFan
San Fransico - GSWarriors1, TheNext23? and Harry Palmer
Seattle - HeavyP
St. Louis - Fatty
Tampa Bay - QBKilla
Tennessee - J.Kim
Washington - gswhoops

We're Moving all trade discussions and Draft Picks (up to now) to this part of the board

likwitdesi · Post #2 » by **likwitdesi** » Mon Apr 2, 2007 1:20 am

Can I get the Raiduhs?

Post #3 » by **f l u r p** » Mon Apr 2, 2007 5:18 am

J Kim, I did the Cowboys first round and have my placeholder in for round 2. Might as well edit me in there for Dallas.

Post #4 » by **GameTime_3** » Mon Apr 2, 2007 4:09 pm

i think some1 needs to repick for fatty because he most think he drafted and not checked back. also i think there needs to me a notice on general board for this draft

Post #5 » by **Next Coming** » Mon Apr 2, 2007 7:33 pm

Do the Rams value the back up RB position that much that they'll spend a 2nd rounder on Antonio Pittman?

defnite · Post #6 » by **defnite** » Mon Apr 2, 2007 7:44 pm

Not when Mike Martz was coaching, but it is always good to have a balanced attack, it makes the rams less predictable.

Post #7 » by **Next Coming** » Mon Apr 2, 2007 8:11 pm

I agree. You always need 2 RB's but Stephen Jackson is a legitimate top 5 RB and I don't see the thinking in drafting a RB so high if he is going to be a backup.

Post #8 » by **Manhattan Project** » Mon Apr 2, 2007 9:16 pm

Yeah makes no sense in my book Pittman could of been had in the third round. Hardly worth that pick considering some names still on the board that can make an impact this year.

Monkeyfeng06 · Post #9 » by **Monkeyfeng06** » Tue Apr 3, 2007 4:28 am

rams select pittman? :rofl:

steven jackson is godlike!!!

as for Daymeion Hughes..... i was tempted to use my 2nd round pick on him but he's SOOOOO SLOW for a CBs.... even the draft report says he's vastly overrated.

Fatty · Post #10 » by **Fatty** » Wed Apr 4, 2007 3:11 am

f the world and its draft reports. I don't pay attention to combine numbers but hughes was a very good CB for Cal. I was tempted to draft Josh Beekman but will probaly address later

Monkeyfeng06 · Post #11 » by **Monkeyfeng06** » Wed Apr 4, 2007 4:24 am

Fatty wrote:f the world and its draft reports. I don't pay attention to combine numbers but hughes was a very good CB for Cal. I was tempted to draft Josh Beekman but will probaly address later

well..... it's different in the pros.... hughes's 40 yard is unacceptable for pro football in my opinion. its way too slow.

philbe311 · Post #12 » by **philbe311** » Wed Apr 4, 2007 6:02 pm

I was salavating thinking I might get Zach Miller @ 57, but am very happy with Tanard Jackson...

Eagles need corner and safety depth... This guy provides both...

Other considered included Ray McDonald, Aaron Rouse, Jonathan Wade, and Tony Hunt...

Post #13 » by **Manhattan Project** » Wed Apr 4, 2007 10:07 pm

I feel that the Jets would be able to make Harris gain some weight and he could be an effective RT. Notre Dame is a no nonsense school, much like Tangini so im comfortable with taking a risk.

Post #14 » by **GameTime_3** » Wed Apr 4, 2007 10:18 pm

i think this draft should go 2 round and start the new one so we can have 1 more in before the draft and with all the new trades

Post #15 » by **PhilipNelsonFan** » Thu Apr 5, 2007 8:57 am

its game time wrote:i think this draft should go 2 round and start the new one so we can have 1 more in before the draft and with all the new trades

No, it should go three rounds, but until you submit your pick on time it's going NOWHERE. And no one's gonna make a trade with Miami.

Also, we should consider selecting for compensatory picks. If we could, this changes my draft strategy.

Post #16 » by **f l u r p** » Thu Apr 5, 2007 10:48 pm

24 hours since the last pick

Who is supposed to be up for Miami?

Here's the rest of the second round

60 Miami (from New England)
61 Baltimore
62 San Diego
63 N.Y. Jets (from Chicago)
64 Tampa Bay (from Indianapolis)

Post #17 » by **gswhoops** » Fri Apr 6, 2007 12:32 am

its game time, if it was only a 2 round draft why would i have moved down for a rd 3 pick?

D J C · Post #18 » by **D J C** » Fri Apr 6, 2007 1:19 am

I can take the Broncos.

Post #19 » by **lpsevier** » Fri Apr 6, 2007 1:59 pm

Its been two days.

philbe311 · Post #20 » by **philbe311** » Fri Apr 6, 2007 3:01 pm

patience is not one of my virtues...