Who's better for Oakland?

Moderator: studcrackers

Who's better for Oakland?

 
Total votes: 0

User avatar
Pierce 4 3
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,710
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 09, 2007
Location: Wherever there is money to steal

Who's better for Oakland? 

Post#1 » by Pierce 4 3 » Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:59 pm

I'm kinda stuck on this one...

:gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip: :gossip:
User avatar
treiz
RealGM
Posts: 11,984
And1: 564
Joined: Aug 17, 2005
Location: London, England
       

 

Post#2 » by treiz » Fri Apr 13, 2007 4:42 pm

I'd have to say Russell, basically because QB is a more important position than WR, Calvin Johnson would be the second option if they don't want Russell. Quinn wouldn't be a good choice since they need to fix that line, and he'd just get trampled compared to Russell, he can actually run.

Lastly, if they want to play it smart, I say draft Thomas, and draft someone like Edwards, or Stanton in the 2nd round, or trade for a QB.
User avatar
lpsevier
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,367
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 28, 2005

 

Post#3 » by lpsevier » Fri Apr 13, 2007 5:00 pm

Why isn't trade down an option?
User avatar
Pierce 4 3
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,710
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 09, 2007
Location: Wherever there is money to steal

 

Post#4 » by Pierce 4 3 » Fri Apr 13, 2007 11:09 pm

lpsevier wrote:Why isn't trade down an option?


Because I said who's better for Oakland, not what's better for Oakland
User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,963
And1: 20,007
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: EOL 6/23
   

 

Post#5 » by FNQ » Sat Apr 14, 2007 1:00 am

Calvin is best for us, so its a lock that we won't take him.
User avatar
Gibbs
Rookie
Posts: 1,161
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 19, 2006

 

Post#6 » by Gibbs » Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:00 am

Really I think Thomas is. Before a QB they need an O-line to prtoect him. Trade down a couple picks and get him.
User avatar
lpsevier
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,367
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 28, 2005

 

Post#7 » by lpsevier » Mon Apr 16, 2007 3:57 pm

Pierce 4 3 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Because I said who's better for Oakland, not what's better for Oakland


Touche.
bech01a1
Senior
Posts: 545
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 15, 2006
Location: levittown

 

Post#8 » by bech01a1 » Mon Apr 16, 2007 6:36 pm

I say take the best player in the draft, which would be Calvin Johnson. Then take Stanton in the second round. I am not completley sold on Russell.
bech01a1
Senior
Posts: 545
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 15, 2006
Location: levittown

 

Post#9 » by bech01a1 » Mon Apr 16, 2007 6:38 pm

treiz wrote:I'd have to say Russell, basically because QB is a more important position than WR, Calvin Johnson would be the second option if they don't want Russell. Quinn wouldn't be a good choice since they need to fix that line, and he'd just get trampled compared to Russell, he can actually run.
Lastly, if they want to play it smart, I say draft Thomas, and draft someone like Edwards, or Stanton in the 2nd round, or trade for a QB.


Actually, Quinn has a better 40 time than Russell, also has a better shuttle time. Quinn is more mobile than people realize. He ran the exact same 40 time as troy smith, who many consider to be a pretty mobile qb.
User avatar
JoeyH
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,842
And1: 17
Joined: Jun 30, 2005

 

Post#10 » by JoeyH » Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:57 pm

bech01a1 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Actually, Quinn has a better 40 time than Russell, also has a better shuttle time. Quinn is more mobile than people realize. He ran the exact same 40 time as troy smith, who many consider to be a pretty mobile qb.


but he is not near as mobile as JaMarcus. Plus it takes about three D-lineman to bring him down.
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 32,491
And1: 3,913
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

 

Post#11 » by gswhoops » Mon Apr 16, 2007 10:45 pm

bech01a1 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Actually, Quinn has a better 40 time than Russell, also has a better shuttle time. Quinn is more mobile than people realize. He ran the exact same 40 time as troy smith, who many consider to be a pretty mobile qb.

There's a difference between running 40 yards in a straight line and dodging defensive linemen in a game situation.
jumanji
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,678
And1: 4
Joined: Mar 24, 2004

 

Post#12 » by jumanji » Mon Apr 16, 2007 11:55 pm

gswhoops wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


There's a difference between running 40 yards in a straight line and dodging defensive linemen in a game situation.


Quinn is more mobile, the shuttle time would bear that out and the weak line at ND would make it unanimous.
bech01a1
Senior
Posts: 545
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 15, 2006
Location: levittown

 

Post#13 » by bech01a1 » Tue Apr 17, 2007 12:20 pm

^^^ Thank you. Thats why I mentioned his shuttle time, which also measures lateral quickness. Quinn is the more mobile qb.
bech01a1
Senior
Posts: 545
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 15, 2006
Location: levittown

 

Post#14 » by bech01a1 » Tue Apr 17, 2007 12:21 pm

JoeyH wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



but he is not near as mobile as JaMarcus. Plus it takes about three D-lineman to bring him down.


Also, yes JaMarcus is obviously huge, he is a freak of nature. But its not like Quinn is 6ft. tall and 200lbs either.
User avatar
OAKTREE NYK1
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,304
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 07, 2004
Location: Sunny Fort Liquordale,FL Originally from the Bronx,NY

 

Post#15 » by OAKTREE NYK1 » Tue Apr 17, 2007 3:14 pm

Well if Chucky swaps picks with the Raiders then you are at number 4 then you are looking at OT Joe Thomas or any of the QB's that drop. Hell you could even trade back up with the Lions for Russell.
"I cant help the poor if I'am one of them, so I got rich and gave back to me that's the win win" Jay-Z

Return to NFL Draft