Mack to the BEARS!

Susan · Post #21 » by **Susan** » Sat Sep 1, 2018 7:02 pm

transplant wrote:
Susan wrote:
transplant wrote:A question for the class.

Reports are that the Bears will be sending a player to the Raiders in addition to the 2 first rounders. Are there any Bears defensive players that would cause you to like the trade significantly less?

Since the Raiders are said to be cash-strapped and now need a pass rusher, If I was Oakland, I’d want Floyd.

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

Amos, Jackson and Floyd would really hurt.

I think it's Kwitkowski just based on my gut.

Yeah, the “player to be named later” has been completely ignored in all of the reports I’ve read, but if it’s a young defensive starter, it’d be a bit of a buzz kill.

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app

It would make sense if it were an O-Linemen or Kevin White. Wims showed me enough to not lose a second of sleep over losing White.

Susan · Post #22 » by **Susan** » Sat Sep 1, 2018 7:10 pm

Read on Twitter

Franchise player.

Post #23 » by **City of Trees** » Sat Sep 1, 2018 8:01 pm

So we got Mack and a 2020 2nd

Pace is the **** man right now

Sent from my LG-H872 using RealGM mobile app

Post #24 » by **RedBulls23** » Sat Sep 1, 2018 8:21 pm

Wow, Bears won this trade easily.

Pace robbed Gruden

Post #25 » by **RedBulls23** » Sat Sep 1, 2018 8:56 pm

Read on Twitter

?s=19

they scared now

Post #26 » by **RedBulls23** » Sat Sep 1, 2018 9:03 pm

Read on Twitter

?s=19

Post #27 » by **RedBulls23** » Sat Sep 1, 2018 9:03 pm

Read on Twitter

?s=19

Post #28 » by **fleet** » Sat Sep 1, 2018 9:53 pm

Read on Twitter

Axxo · Post #29 » by **Axxo** » Sat Sep 1, 2018 10:13 pm

Mack to bears for 6 yr 141M, 90M guaranteed. Hope it set up like Rodgers so we can keep cap flexibility
https://syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/2793759-report-khalil-mack-bears-agree-to-6-year-141m-contract-after-raiders-trade.amp.html

transplant · Post #30 » by **transplant** » Sat Sep 1, 2018 10:32 pm

Axxo wrote:Mack to bears for 6 yr 141M, 90M guaranteed. Hope it set up like Rodgers so we can keep cap flexibility
https://syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/2793759-report-khalil-mack-bears-agree-to-6-year-141m-contract-after-raiders-trade.amp.html

The McCaskeys are cheap? Guess not.

This is incredible!

transplant · Post #31 » by **transplant** » Sat Sep 1, 2018 10:37 pm

transplant wrote:A question for the class.

Reports are that the Bears will be sending a player to the Raiders in addition to the 2 first rounders. Are there any Bears defensive players that would cause you to like the trade significantly less?

Since the Raiders are said to be cash-strapped and now need a pass rusher, If I was Oakland, I’d want Floyd.

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

Now appears that Mack is the only player in this trade. Color me relieved.

Post #32 » by **City of Trees** » Sat Sep 1, 2018 10:39 pm

Axxo wrote:Mack to bears for 6 yr 141M, 90M guaranteed. Hope it set up like Rodgers so we can keep cap flexibility
https://syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/2793759-report-khalil-mack-bears-agree-to-6-year-141m-contract-after-raiders-trade.amp.html

Full contract details

Read on Twitter

Sent from my LG-H872 using RealGM mobile app

Post #33 » by **chitownsports4ever** » Sat Sep 1, 2018 10:47 pm

Great move by Pace and you couldn't have asked for a better opportunity . Week one national tv just became a huge game for the NFL now that Mack is in a major market

Post #34 » by **RedBulls23** » Sat Sep 1, 2018 10:50 pm

Pace was smart to do a move like this right now considering you have rookie deals on the book still. Plus if Mitch works out, he won't be getting paid for a few years.

Axxo · Post #35 » by **Axxo** » Sat Sep 1, 2018 11:18 pm

RedBulls23 wrote:Pace was smart to do a move like this right now considering you have rookie deals on the book still. Plus if Mitch works out, he won't be getting paid for a few years.

Agreed

A position of need and he filled with the best player at this position. Can you imagine what mack is going to be like under Fangio? He is going to go super saiyan on the nfc.

Axxo · Post #36 » by **Axxo** » Sun Sep 2, 2018 12:17 am

You kno you got a good deal when opposing fans areresponding like this about the player you obtained... :lol:

Watch on YouTube

Post #37 » by **HMFFL** » Sun Sep 2, 2018 5:48 am

This was an excellent trade for all parties involved.
Chicago gets the force they need on defense and a guy that's going to make everybody on the line better.
Oakland gets the draft picks they desired. This will leave a huge hole for my Raiders on defense, but I understand the business side of it, and the amount of money he wanted/signed for was, too great.

Congrats!

wco81 · Post #38 » by **wco81** » Sun Sep 2, 2018 12:29 pm

Well Fangio is a better DC than whoever Oakland had.

But does a defensive stud making QB money raise a team like ... a franchise QB?

Oakland defense still sucked with Mack and they couldn’t make the playoffs —well just once.

Similarly, Dolphins weren’t a perennial playoffs team with Suh on that big contract either.

It definitely works better that Trubitsky is on a rookie deal.

Axxo · Post #39 » by **Axxo** » Sun Sep 2, 2018 1:29 pm

HMFFL wrote:This was an excellent trade for all parties involved.
Chicago gets the force they need on defense and a guy that's going to make everybody on the line better.
Oakland gets the draft picks they desired. This will leave a huge hole for my Raiders on defense, but I understand the business side of it, and the amount of money he wanted/signed for was, too great.

Congrats!

Thanks H, you guys have alot of nice pieces. Enjoy those picks. If you guys have anyone else you thinking of moving give us a shout :wink:

Chi town · Post #40 » by **Chi town** » Sun Sep 2, 2018 2:31 pm

RedBulls23 wrote:

Read on Twitter
?s=19

they scared now

He’s the best read of the Bears on the web. Jahns and Zeglinski from WindyCutyGridiron are great too.