GM a Team Part 4 - Draft Pick Thread

[sterncohen]

UPDATED THROUGH 9/23 8:00 PM. - TRANSACTIONS THREAD PAGE 9

This thread will contain information on which teams own which picks. If you make a trade involving a draft pick, please check this page first to make sure that the teams involved really have the picks they're trading.

At the start of the game, I am using information from the Real GM future draft picks page. It is missing at least one draft pick transaction I know of - Golden State sent a pick to NJ for Marcus Williams, but I don't know what year and with what protection. (CORRECTED) If you know of any other transactions that are missing here, please post to that effect. I'll make corrections as soon as I can verify them.

In this game we will not be applying the NBA rule that prevents teams from trading first-round picks in consecutive years. Trade away.

If you are trading a pick, but protecting it, you need to specify what happens if the protection kicks in. So, for example "2009 1st round pick, top-10 protected" isn't enough information. If the pick turns out to be in the top 10, what other compensation does the receiving team receive instead?

You'll note in the lists that follow that a bunch of picks are marked "FROZEN." What this means is that they are part of conditional trades involving pick protection. For example, you'll see in the 2009 post that Charlotte owes Denver its 2009 first-round pick, and this pick is top-14 protected in 2009, top-12 in 2010, top-10 in 2011, top-8 in 2012. (We're not dealing with any picks after 2012 in this game.) If you've got Charlotte, all of those future first-rounders are frozen; you may wind up owing one of them to Denver and there's no way to know yet which one. If you want to free up these picks, you've got two choices. (1) You can make another trade with Denver that changes the arrangements. (2) You can trade a future first rounder to another team, and say in your post that you're removing the protection from the Denver deal. In the real NBA, you'd have to get Denver's consent for this - maybe they're hoping to get your pick in 2010 rather than 2009. In this game, that won't be necessary - we'll assume that any trade that gets your pick to another team faster is to their advantage, so they won't have to approve it.

[sterncohen]

2009

ATLANTA 1 -
ATLANTA 2 -
BOSTON 1 – To MINNESOTA, TOP-3 PROTECTED (2/2010, 1/2011, UNP 2012)
BOSTON 2 –
CHARLOTTE 1 – To DENVER, TOP-14 PROTECTED (12/2010, 10/2011, 8/2012)
CHARLOTTE 2 - To LA LAKERS
CHICAGO 1 -
CHICAGO 2 – To CLEVELAND - TO NEW YORK (approved p. 2 transactions thread)
CLEVELAND 1 - To TORONTO (approved p.9 transactions thread)
CLEVELAND 2 – To MIAMI

DALLAS 1 –
DALLAS 2 –
DENVER 1 –
DENVER 2 – To PORTLAND
DETROIT 1 -
DETROIT 2 -
GOLDEN STATE 1 -
GOLDEN STATE 2 – To PHOENIX
HOUSTON 1 -
HOUSTON 2 – To SAN ANTONIO

INDIANA 1 -
INDIANA 2 – To MIAMI; FROZEN (See 2009 Miami 2)
LA CLIPPERS 1 -
LA CLIPPERS 2 – To PORTLAND
LA LAKERS 1 -
LA LAKERS 2 –
MEMPHIS 1 – To WASHINGTON, TOP-16 PROTECTED (14/2010, 2011, 2012)
MEMPHIS 2 – To HOUSTON
MIAMI 1 – To MINNESOTA, TOP-10 PROTECTED (6/2010, UNP 2011)
MIAMI 2 – FROZEN (Two least favorable of MIA, IND and PHI 2’s go to Minnesota)

MILWAUKEE 1 –
MILWAUKEE 2 –
MINNESOTA 1 – To LA CLIPPERS, TOP-10 PROTECTED (10/2010, 2011, UNP/12)
MINNESOTA 2 – To DETROIT
NEW ORLEANS 1 –
NEW ORLEANS 2 – To SAN ANTONIO
NEW JERSEY 1 –
NEW JERSEY 2 – To OKLAHOMA CITY
NEW YORK 1 – To UTAH, TOP-22 PROTECTED (UNP/10)
NEW YORK 2 – To PORTLAND

OKLAHOMA CITY 1 –
OKLAHOMA CITY 2 –
ORLANDO 1 –
ORLANDO 2 – To PHOENIX, TOP-55 PROTECTED; OWE NOTHING IF TOP-55
PHILADELPHIA 1 –
PHILADELPHIA 2 – To MIAMI; FROZEN (See 2009 Miami 2)
PHOENIX 1 –
PHOENIX 2 –
PORTLAND 1 –
PORTLAND 2 –

SACRAMENTO 1 –
SACRAMENTO 2 –
SAN ANTONIO 1 –To OKLAHOMA CITY, TOP-15 PROT (10/2010, 5/11, 3/12)
SAN ANTONIO 2 – To CHARLOTTE if worse than 2009 New Orleans 2
TORONTO 1 –
TORONTO 2 – To DETROIT
UTAH 1 – To MINNESOTA, TOP-22 PROTECTED (15/2010, 17/11, 16/12)
UTAH 2 –
WASHINGTON 1 –
WASHINGTON 2 -

[sterncohen]

2010

ATLANTA 1 -
ATLANTA 2 -
BOSTON 1 – FROZEN – See 2009 Boston 1
BOSTON 2 –
CHARLOTTE 1 – FROZEN – See 2009 Charlotte 1
CHARLOTTE 2 -
CHICAGO 1 -
CHICAGO 2 -
CLEVELAND 1 - To DALLAS (approved p. 8 transactions thread)
CLEVELAND 2 -

DALLAS 1 – To NEW JERSEY
DALLAS 2 –
DENVER 1 –
DENVER 2 –
DETROIT 1 -
DETROIT 2 -
GOLDEN STATE 1 -
GOLDEN STATE 2 -
HOUSTON 1 -
HOUSTON 2 – To MINNESOTA

INDIANA 1 -
INDIANA 2 -
LA CLIPPERS 1 -
LA CLIPPERS 2 -
LA LAKERS 1 – To MEMPHIS, TOP-6 PROTECTED (6/2011)
LA LAKERS 2 –
MEMPHIS 1 – FROZEN – See 2009 Memphis 1
MEMPHIS 2 – To LA LAKERS
MIAMI 1 – FROZEN – See 2009 Miami 1
MIAMI 2 –

MILWAUKEE 1 –
MILWAUKEE 2 –
MINNESOTA 1 – FROZEN (See 2009 Minnesota 1)
MINNESOTA 2 –
NEW ORLEANS 1 –
NEW ORLEANS 2 -
NEW JERSEY 1 –
NEW JERSEY 2 –
NEW YORK 1 – FROZEN (See 2009 New York 1)
NEW YORK 2 –

OKLAHOMA CITY 1 –
OKLAHOMA CITY 2 –
ORLANDO 1 –
ORLANDO 2 –
PHILADELPHIA 1 –
PHILADELPHIA 2 –
PHOENIX 1 – To OKLAHOMA CITY
PHOENIX 2 –
PORTLAND 1 –
PORTLAND 2 –

SACRAMENTO 1 –
SACRAMENTO 2 –
SAN ANTONIO 1 – FROZEN (See 2009 San Antonio 1)
SAN ANTONIO 2 – To MIAMI (David Padgett trade, approved p. 3 transactions thread)
TORONTO 1 –
TORONTO 2 –
UTAH 1 – FROZEN (See 2009 Utah 1)
UTAH 2 –
WASHINGTON 1 –
WASHINGTON 2 -

[sterncohen]

2011

ATLANTA 1 -
ATLANTA 2 -
BOSTON 1 – FROZEN – See 2009 Boston 1
BOSTON 2 –
CHARLOTTE 1 – FROZEN – See 2009 Charlotte 1
CHARLOTTE 2 -
CHICAGO 1 -
CHICAGO 2 -
CLEVELAND 1 -
CLEVELAND 2 - To TORONTO (approved 9. 9 transactions thread)

DALLAS 1 –
DALLAS 2 –
DENVER 1 –
DENVER 2 – PORTLAND has right to swap picks or defer swap to 2012
DETROIT 1 -
DETROIT 2 -
GOLDEN STATE 1 - To NJ, TOP-14 PROTECTED (11/2012)
GOLDEN STATE 2 -
HOUSTON 1 -
HOUSTON 2 -

INDIANA 1 -
INDIANA 2 -
LA CLIPPERS 1 -
LA CLIPPERS 2 -
LA LAKERS 1 – FROZEN – See 2011 LAL 1
LA LAKERS 2 –
MEMPHIS 1 – FROZEN – See 2009 Memphis 1
MEMPHIS 2 -
MIAMI 1 – FROZEN – See 2009 Miami 1
MIAMI 2 –

MILWAUKEE 1 –
MILWAUKEE 2 –
MINNESOTA 1 – FROZEN (See 2009 Minnesota 1)
MINNESOTA 2 –
NEW ORLEANS 1 –
NEW ORLEANS 2 -
NEW JERSEY 1 –
NEW JERSEY 2 –
NEW YORK 1 –
NEW YORK 2 –

OKLAHOMA CITY 1 –
OKLAHOMA CITY 2 –
ORLANDO 1 –
ORLANDO 2 –
PHILADELPHIA 1 –
PHILADELPHIA 2 –
PHOENIX 1 –
PHOENIX 2 –
PORTLAND 1 –
PORTLAND 2 –

SACRAMENTO 1 –
SACRAMENTO 2 –
SAN ANTONIO 1 – FROZEN (See 2009 San Antonio 1)
SAN ANTONIO 2 –
TORONTO 1 –
TORONTO 2 – To DETROIT
UTAH 1 – FROZEN (See 2009 Utah 1)
UTAH 2 –
WASHINGTON 1 –
WASHINGTON 2 –

[sterncohen]

2012

ATLANTA 1 -
ATLANTA 2 -
BOSTON 1 – FROZEN – See 2009 Boston 1
BOSTON 2 –
CHARLOTTE 1 -
CHARLOTTE 2 -
CHICAGO 1 -
CHICAGO 2 -
CLEVELAND 1 -
CLEVELAND 2 - To DALLAS (approved p. 9 transactions thread)

DALLAS 1 –
DALLAS 2 –
DENVER 1 –
DENVER 2 – FROZEN – See 2011 Denver 2
DETROIT 1 -
DETROIT 2 -
GOLDEN STATE 1 -
GOLDEN STATE 2 - FROZEN - See 2011 GS 1
HOUSTON 1 -
HOUSTON 2 -

INDIANA 1 -
INDIANA 2 -
LA CLIPPERS 1 -
LA CLIPPERS 2 -
LA LAKERS 1 -
LA LAKERS 2 –
MEMPHIS 1 – FROZEN – See 2009 Memphis 1
MEMPHIS 2 -
MIAMI 1 –
MIAMI 2 –

MILWAUKEE 1 –
MILWAUKEE 2 –
MINNESOTA 1 – FROZEN (See 2009 Minnesota 1)
MINNESOTA 2 –
NEW ORLEANS 1 –
NEW ORLEANS 2 -
NEW JERSEY 1 –
NEW JERSEY 2 –
NEW YORK 1 –
NEW YORK 2 –

OKLAHOMA CITY 1 –
OKLAHOMA CITY 2 –
ORLANDO 1 –
ORLANDO 2 –
PHILADELPHIA 1 –
PHILADELPHIA 2 –
PHOENIX 1 –
PHOENIX 2 –
PORTLAND 1 –
PORTLAND 2 –

SACRAMENTO 1 –
SACRAMENTO 2 –
SAN ANTONIO 1 – FROZEN (See 2009 San Antonio 1)
SAN ANTONIO 2 –
TORONTO 1 –
TORONTO 2 –
UTAH 1 – FROZEN (See 2009 Utah 1)
UTAH 2 –
WASHINGTON 1 –
WASHINGTON 2 -

[CellarDoor]

one note: Chicago traded multiple 2nds in the Omar Asik trade. One of them is accurately reflected (the NYK 2009 one), but Chicago also traded their 2010 2nd rounder to Pdx in that deal.

[dockingsched]

2010:

"The Clippers on Tuesday night swung a trade to import Denver Nuggets center Marcus Camby as their Brand replacement for the minuscule cost of giving Denver the option to swap second-round picks in 2010, capitalizing on the Nuggets' need to shed salary to create their own financial flexibility."

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3491156

[sterncohen]

Corrected to include the changes noted in the last two posts. Thanks.