RealGM

Chandan wrote:

cgf wrote:
In most contexts it would be unbelievable, but this is last season's MVP, playing at home (with Philly fans in about half of the seats), and if he had been tossed...like he should've been...then his team's season was over. I'm not suprised that the refs in that situation did everything they could to keep him on the court.

a fraudulent outcome to begin with. Everyone except Philly fans know Jokic deserved it more.

eyeatoma wrote:

Scalabrine wrote:

eyeatoma wrote:
Ah, but nothing actually happened in that play. So quit whining about it. Robinson was hurt on another play, which was inadvertent. What Embiid did was dirty. At no point did I say it was okay.

Stop with the moral grandstanding. You guys need to make 10 threads about it, moaning about the same thing. This place is an echo chamber, Reddit level ****.

DUDE,

you were running through every thread on here saying the league is rigged and that the outcomes of the game were already pre-determined after Game 2. You wouldn't stop crying about it.

You seem like a very unhappy, bitter person that doesn't even like the NBA. Just go do something else with your life that you might enjoy more.

LOL, that **** was indisputable. The Knicks were 100% not supposed to win that game. In 99.999% of all other instances the Sixers would have won.

The two are not the same. Embiid didn't try to hurt someone, that is actually up for debate. As I said he was being dirty. That IMO is not debatable.

eyeatoma wrote:

Chandan wrote:

cgf wrote:
In most contexts it would be unbelievable, but this is last season's MVP, playing at home (with Philly fans in about half of the seats), and if he had been tossed...like he should've been...then his team's season was over. I'm not suprised that the refs in that situation did everything they could to keep him on the court.

a fraudulent outcome to begin with. Everyone except Philly fans know Jokic deserved it more.

Hmmm actually Embiid should have won the last 3 MVPs. If he weren't injured in the 1st two he would have won them. He won last year, and he would have won this year unanimously. 4 TIME MVP! I know it's hard to cope that the Raptors future is R.J. Barrett, and Masai missed out on tons of opportunities to cash out on Pascal and Lowry properly.

Cubbies2120 wrote:

eyeatoma wrote:

Chandan wrote:
a fraudulent outcome to begin with. Everyone except Philly fans know Jokic deserved it more.

Hmmm actually Embiid should have won the last 3 MVPs. If he weren't injured in the 1st two he would have won them. He won last year, and he would have won this year unanimously. 4 TIME MVP! I know it's hard to cope that the Raptors future is R.J. Barrett, and Masai missed out on tons of opportunities to cash out on Pascal and Lowry properly.

I think we both know Embiid won last year's MVP by having his homies in the media run a media campaign claiming anyone who voted Jokic was "racist".

Plus how can you be an "MVP" when each year when the stakes are highest you fail to even play at an all-star level as a franchise cornerstone? Like, in terms of playoff performers, Joel isn't even a top 20 in the league is he?

Spare me the 'he's injured" bit. Jokic said everyone's injured this time of year so Embiid has no excuse(s).

FireMorey wrote:Mitchell Robinson didn't drown in a fishing accident, the dude's legs were lightly touched by Joel Embiid laying on the ground. News flash: incessant whining and childish hyperbole is not going to make people side with you. It just comes off like you being a drama queen. Grow up and go outside. Sweet Maria.

Cubbies2120 wrote:

FireMorey wrote:Mitchell Robinson didn't drown in a fishing accident, the dude's legs were lightly touched by Joel Embiid laying on the ground. News flash: incessant whining and childish hyperbole is not going to make people side with you. It just comes off like you being a drama queen. Grow up and go outside. Sweet Maria.

Another awesome justification of Embiid's play on Mitchell.

DaGawd wrote:

Cubbies2120 wrote:

FireMorey wrote:Mitchell Robinson didn't drown in a fishing accident, the dude's legs were lightly touched by Joel Embiid laying on the ground. News flash: incessant whining and childish hyperbole is not going to make people side with you. It just comes off like you being a drama queen. Grow up and go outside. Sweet Maria.

Another awesome justification of Embiid's play on Mitchell.

the copium for their franchise player being a ass clown is off the charts

eyeatoma wrote:

Scalabrine wrote:

eyeatoma wrote:
Ah, but nothing actually happened in that play. So quit whining about it. Robinson was hurt on another play, which was inadvertent. What Embiid did was dirty. At no point did I say it was okay.

Stop with the moral grandstanding. You guys need to make 10 threads about it, moaning about the same thing. This place is an echo chamber, Reddit level ****.

DUDE,

you were running through every thread on here saying the league is rigged and that the outcomes of the game were already pre-determined after Game 2. You wouldn't stop crying about it.

You seem like a very unhappy, bitter person that doesn't even like the NBA. Just go do something else with your life that you might enjoy more.

LOL, that **** was indisputable. The Knicks were 100% not supposed to win that game. In 99.999% of all other instances the Sixers would have won.

The two are not the same. Embiid didn't try to hurt someone, that is actually up for debate. As I said he was being dirty. That IMO is not debatable.

Nuntius wrote:

eyeatoma wrote:

Scalabrine wrote:
DUDE,

you were running through every thread on here saying the league is rigged and that the outcomes of the game were already pre-determined after Game 2. You wouldn't stop crying about it.

You seem like a very unhappy, bitter person that doesn't even like the NBA. Just go do something else with your life that you might enjoy more.

LOL, that **** was indisputable. The Knicks were 100% not supposed to win that game. In 99.999% of all other instances the Sixers would have won.

The two are not the same. Embiid didn't try to hurt someone, that is actually up for debate. As I said he was being dirty. That IMO is not debatable.

What is actually indisputable is that Embiid DID try to injure Robinson. You don't bear hug someone's legs without the intent to injure them. You do it with intent to harm. Period.

76ciology wrote:I also posted this aside from the WWE acting post

76ciology wrote:Regarding the Joel Embiid-Mitchell Robinson incident:

I'm not a fan of what Embiid did; it was surely a dirty play. It's not because Embiid is a bad person who wants to hurt someone, but rather because he's emotional, immature, and undergoing a lot of stress. However, he has to do better. Many people think it could have been a flagrant 2, and if it were, we'd likely be down 3-0.

Nevertheless, I don't think what Embiid did was the reason for Mitchell Robinson missing the game. He grabbed the right leg, while Mitchell seems to have hurt his left ankle. Mitchell was also able to stand on his own and play through the first half.

QingJames wrote:

76ciology wrote:I also posted this aside from the WWE acting post

76ciology wrote:Regarding the Joel Embiid-Mitchell Robinson incident:

I'm not a fan of what Embiid did; it was surely a dirty play. It's not because Embiid is a bad person who wants to hurt someone, but rather because he's emotional, immature, and undergoing a lot of stress. However, he has to do better. Many people think it could have been a flagrant 2, and if it were, we'd likely be down 3-0.

Nevertheless, I don't think what Embiid did was the reason for Mitchell Robinson missing the game. He grabbed the right leg, while Mitchell seems to have hurt his left ankle. Mitchell was also able to stand on his own and play through the first half.

Robinson hurt his left ankle because Embiid fell on it…

76ciology wrote:

QingJames wrote:

76ciology wrote:I also posted this aside from the WWE acting post

Robinson hurt his left ankle because Embiid fell on it…

DaGawd wrote:

76ciology wrote:

QingJames wrote:Robinson hurt his left ankle because Embiid fell on it…

he might be referring to the later play where embiid recklessly drove and flopped to the ground rolling over robinson’s ankle in the process

eyeatoma wrote:

DaGawd wrote:

76ciology wrote:

he might be referring to the later play where embiid recklessly drove and flopped to the ground rolling over robinson’s ankle in the process

There was no flop, he fell.Unfortunate that Robinson's ankle was there.

eyeatoma wrote:Good lord call the waaahmbulance. You guys are grown men whining about a bush league play.

Literally all of you would be ecstatic if he were on your team.

Sent from my SM-S928B using Tapatalk

kveble wrote:

eyeatoma wrote:

DaGawd wrote:he might be referring to the later play where embiid recklessly drove and flopped to the ground rolling over robinson’s ankle in the process

There was no flop, he fell.Unfortunate that Robinson's ankle was there.

LOL it`s an obvious flop. He pushes backwards with his legs.

eyeatoma wrote:

kveble wrote:

eyeatoma wrote:

There was no flop, he fell.Unfortunate that Robinson's ankle was there.

LOL it`s an obvious flop. He pushes backwards with his legs.

Read on Twitter

Watcha gain, Embiid drives, Robinson either slips or flops, and twists his ankle on Donte DiVincenzo's shoe. The board doesn't even have it right, but w/e, never let facts get in the way of a good story.

eyeatoma wrote:

kveble wrote:

eyeatoma wrote:

There was no flop, he fell.Unfortunate that Robinson's ankle was there.

LOL it`s an obvious flop. He pushes backwards with his legs.

Read on Twitter

Watch gain, Embiid drives, Robinson either slips or flops, and twists his ankle on Donte DiVincenzo's shoe. The board doesn't even have it right, but w/e, never let facts get in the way of a good story.