Page 1 of 2
Jose Reyes vs Hanley Ramirez
Posted: Wed Apr 4, 2007 1:49 am
by NYKnick87
Which one would you take? It's a tough one.
Both are special players. Hanley has more power, but defense and speed goes to Reyes.
I'm going with Reyes, but Hanley definitely has the talent to be better.
Posted: Wed Apr 4, 2007 1:57 am
by sunshinekids99
I'll take Reyes, but Ramirez will be a heck of a player.
Posted: Wed Apr 4, 2007 2:06 am
by kg2005
Its definitely Reyes. He's proven it over a longer period of time.
Posted: Wed Apr 4, 2007 2:14 am
by bigboy1234
kg2005 wrote:Its definitely Reyes. He's proven it over a longer period of time.
How do you figure this?
Posted: Wed Apr 4, 2007 2:20 am
by maseda17
I like them equally now with the slight edge to Reyes but I think Hanley is eventually going to be a 30+ homer guy.
Posted: Wed Apr 4, 2007 3:07 am
by kg2005
bigboy1234 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
How do you figure this?
Ramirez was a rookie last year? A lot of people predict he won't be as good this year.
Posted: Wed Apr 4, 2007 3:14 am
by Jose7
People talk about how Hanley is going to be a 30+ HR guy which is probably is, Reyes will be also, just watch. He is a monster in the weight room and he grew in size so much since last year.
Posted: Wed Apr 4, 2007 3:15 am
by Andrea>Dirk
Reyes for now
Posted: Wed Apr 4, 2007 3:22 am
by bigboy1234
kg2005 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Ramirez was a rookie last year? A lot of people predict he won't be as good this year.
Yeah, but you said Reyes has been doing it longer when the previous 1200 ABs(before last season) he had an OPS lower than .700 and an OBP just over .300. Plus I was just giving you a hard time anyways.
Posted: Wed Apr 4, 2007 3:37 am
by kg2005
bigboy1234 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Yeah, but you said Reyes has been doing it longer when the previous 1200 ABs(before last season) he had an OPS lower than .700 and an OBP just over .300. Plus I was just giving you a hard time anyways.
Yeah, but that OPS was a whole lot better than Hanley's .000 OPS.
Posted: Wed Apr 4, 2007 12:41 pm
by Basketball Jesus
kg2005 wrote:
Yeah, but that OPS was a whole lot better than Hanley's .000 OPS.
...
Posted: Wed Apr 4, 2007 12:56 pm
by HeelSox
Posted: Wed Apr 4, 2007 5:35 pm
by kg2005
I'm trying to make a point that Ramirez didn't play. Obviously he got a few at bats and his OPS wasn't 0, but I didn't look it up.
Posted: Fri Apr 6, 2007 1:37 am
by Baller 24
This is stupid! Reyes in a heartbeat.
Posted: Fri Apr 6, 2007 3:58 am
by The Rondo Show
kg2005 wrote:I'm trying to make a point that Ramirez didn't play. Obviously he got a few at bats and his OPS wasn't 0, but I didn't look it up.
So being in the majors and being terrible gives one a better track record than not being in the majors? I'd take Reyes over Hanley as well, but certainly not because of their track records. Jose Reyes sucked dick until last year.
Posted: Fri Apr 6, 2007 10:27 pm
by Bow2Yao11
I would have to say Reyes. Pretty close though. Reyes does have more power and is probably better defensively too.
Re:
Posted: Wed Apr 8, 2009 1:19 pm
by Flash3
Bow2Yao11 wrote:I would have to say Reyes. Pretty close though. Reyes does have more power and is probably better defensively too.
-- still funny months afterwards
Re: Jose Reyes vs Hanley Ramirez
Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 10:30 pm
by Dizzzzle
If I had to pick one to start a franchise, id go Hanley because of his youth. But Reyes does always seem to be well liked around the clubhouse. However, I think over time Hanley will become much more of a clutch hitter
Re: Jose Reyes vs Hanley Ramirez
Posted: Fri Jul 3, 2009 2:34 am
by travis minor
bump for lols
Re: Jose Reyes vs Hanley Ramirez
Posted: Sat Aug 1, 2009 9:37 pm
by Tim_Hardawayy
At this point Hanley has the potential to go down as the best hitting shortstop of all-time*
*at least, the best that never tested positive for Roids, lol A-Rod
