Image ImageImage Image

ESPN: Teams In the 2010 Hunt

Moderators: HomoSapien, kulaz3000, Michael Jackson, Ice Man, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, Payt10, RedBulls23, coldfish, AshyLarrysDiaper, fleet

theanimal23
RealGM
Posts: 17,744
And1: 926
Joined: Mar 02, 2005

ESPN: Teams In the 2010 Hunt 

Post#1 » by theanimal23 » Fri Oct 30, 2009 6:14 pm

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/dailydime ... -091030-31
Our own extensive consultation with one veteran team capologist returned a list of seven teams that should have at least $10 million in spending money next summer, provided that the revenue dip is indeed closer to 2.5 percent and the $53.6 million cap that would go with it.

A disclaimer is required to make it clear that the math involved in such projections can vary from team to team, especially this many months in advance. Another East exec we spoke to is holding firm in his belief that the 2010-11 salary cap will be closer to the dreaded $50 million range, no matter how many of his colleagues believe otherwise, with a fellow pessimist from West predicting a cap fall to $51-52 million.

"When in doubt," said the East resident, "go bleak."


CHICAGO
$53.6 million salary cap: $12.9 million of cap space
$50 million salary cap: $9.3 million of cap space

What it means: Sources with knowledge of the Bulls' thinking say Chicago wants to get a decent look at this group before deciding how to attack July 2010. There's also the perennial possibility that Kirk Hinrich gets moved, which could wind up creating more cap space than the Bulls currently envision depending on what they would have to take back in a trade involving Hinrich. Yet this much we know for sure: Chicago naturally believes it's set at the point with Derrick Rose and has one trusty big man for the future in Joakim Noah. Any eight-figure amount of cap room is going to help them keep adding quality to the core, although that is another best-case scenario that assumes restricted free agent Tyrus Thomas will have been traded elsewhere.


NEW JERSEY
$53.6 million salary cap: $24.9 million in cap space
$50 million salary cap: $21.3 million in cap space

NEW YORK
$53.6 million salary cap: $23.4 million in cap space
$50 million salary cap: $19.8 million in cap space

MIAMI
$53.6 million salary cap: $18.5 million of cap space
$50 million salary cap: $14.9 million of cap space

CHICAGO
$53.6 million salary cap: $12.9 million of cap space
$50 million salary cap: $9.3 million of cap space

MINNESOTA
$53.6 million salary cap: $12.5 million of cap space
$50 million salary cap: $8.9 million of cap space

OKLAHOMA CITY

$53.6 million salary cap: $11.8 million of cap space
$50 million salary cap: $8.2 million of cap space

L.A. CLIPPERS

$53.6 million salary cap: $11.1 million of cap space
$50 million salary cap: $7.5 million of cap space
Sever82
Veteran
Posts: 2,592
And1: 47
Joined: Feb 13, 2009

Re: ESPN: Teams In the 2010 Hunt 

Post#2 » by Sever82 » Fri Oct 30, 2009 6:41 pm

I'm confused, with Miller and Jerome's salary coming off the books, i thought the bulls had more than 12.9 million in cap space? I know you can maybe add in Salmons and possibly Thomas and Hinrich.
Frank Vogel (Pacer's Coach) on Derrick Rose: "Iverson's Speed, Jason Kidd's Vision, Chauncey Billups Shot and Michael Jordans Athleticism."
User avatar
Scott May
Head Coach
Posts: 7,104
And1: 24
Joined: Jul 05, 2001

Re: ESPN: Teams In the 2010 Hunt 

Post#3 » by Scott May » Fri Oct 30, 2009 6:43 pm

Sever82 wrote:I'm confused, with Miller and Jerome's salary coming off the books, i thought the bulls had more than 12.9 million in cap space? I know you can maybe add in Salmons and possibly Thomas and Hinrich.


Sham'll be along any minute now to sort this all out for us.
On indefinite hiatus as of May 27, 2014.
BuffaloBull
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,751
And1: 576
Joined: Jan 10, 2008

Re: ESPN: Teams In the 2010 Hunt 

Post#4 » by BuffaloBull » Fri Oct 30, 2009 7:00 pm

This calculation assumes a Salmons opt-in.
User avatar
SephCast
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,272
And1: 95
Joined: May 22, 2003

Re: ESPN: Teams In the 2010 Hunt 

Post#5 » by SephCast » Fri Oct 30, 2009 7:07 pm

Yeah, Salmons will probably opt out, which will give us a cool 5.8 million in extra space.

http://www.shamsports.com/content/pages ... /bulls.jsp
gf2020hotmail
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,569
And1: 341
Joined: Jul 01, 2006

Re: ESPN: Teams In the 2010 Hunt 

Post#6 » by gf2020hotmail » Fri Oct 30, 2009 7:11 pm

Those numbers seem low, especially if Tyrus or a Tyrus caphold isn't on the books.
User avatar
HINrichPolice
General Manager
Posts: 8,654
And1: 1,706
Joined: Jul 09, 2003
Location: sometimes on your television

Re: ESPN: Teams In the 2010 Hunt 

Post#7 » by HINrichPolice » Fri Oct 30, 2009 7:15 pm

I don't know how anyone can be sure about what Salmons will do. There's reasons for either opting in or out.

I hope he opts out. If I were him, maybe I look at all the teams with cap space and figure that someone will be willing to give me money. Also, who knows what will happen to the cap in the future. If it doesn't grow, then now's as good a time as ever to take advantage.
CONTENDERS FIND A WAY
kodo
RealGM
Posts: 18,640
And1: 13,290
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Location: Northshore Burbs
 

Re: ESPN: Teams In the 2010 Hunt 

Post#8 » by kodo » Fri Oct 30, 2009 8:11 pm

It would be highly unusual for Salmons not to opt out, he's the remaining highest scorer on a playoff team, and he gets paid less than Chris Duhon. Even if it were not 2010, he'd still easily be able to make more than MLE. I think that's why most people are assuming a Salmons opt out in the salary estimations.
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 55,695
And1: 15,792
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: ESPN: Teams In the 2010 Hunt 

Post#9 » by dougthonus » Fri Oct 30, 2009 8:15 pm

kodo wrote:It would be highly unusual for Salmons not to opt out, he's the remaining highest scorer on a playoff team, and he gets paid less than Chris Duhon. Even if it were not 2010, he'd still easily be able to make more than MLE. I think that's why most people are assuming a Salmons opt out in the salary estimations.


That would certainly apply if that was this year.

However, next year will depend entirely on what he does this year. I agree that he'll most likely opt out, but if he has a dreadful year he won't.
http://linktr.ee/bullsbeat - links to the bullsbeat podcast
@doug_thonus on twitter
User avatar
Salo23
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,590
And1: 415
Joined: Jul 09, 2001

Re: ESPN: Teams In the 2010 Hunt 

Post#10 » by Salo23 » Fri Oct 30, 2009 8:22 pm

Let's say Salmons opts out of his deal, could he still be included in a sign and trade?

If he decides to opt in, is there a waiting period before we could trade his contract?

I feel if we go after Wade we will try to push a sign and trade involving either Hinrich or Salmons.
“We are missing a lot of layups right now as a team, and that is on me... It’s my job to make sure we’re ready to make our layups." - Thibodeau.
User avatar
Ben
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,717
And1: 2,850
Joined: Feb 09, 2006

Re: ESPN: Teams In the 2010 Hunt 

Post#11 » by Ben » Fri Oct 30, 2009 8:41 pm

The move that would make the most sense in the world would be for Lebron to walk and join Miami. Someone joining Wade is the only way that 2 superstars will be united via FA, and they could retain Beasley & Chalmers plus any vet ring-chasers who might want to sign on for a year (maybe Camby, or maybe JON sticks around for the vet min?)

Obviously I hope that that doesn't happen. But if Lebron gets disgruntled playing with scrubs and feels content leaving $20-30 million on the table since he'll be earning hundreds of millions over his career, and if he wants to be in a sunny climate with beautiful women year-round, Miami seems like a logical choice. All other teams would be left scrambling madly just to stay barely competitive.

I would expect mass retirements from older guys who physically could stick it out a year or two longer but who instead look at Dwyane and Lebron and say, "why bother?" :lol:
User avatar
sdeezy
RealGM
Posts: 14,244
And1: 122
Joined: Jul 15, 2007

Re: ESPN: Teams In the 2010 Hunt 

Post#12 » by sdeezy » Fri Oct 30, 2009 8:46 pm

Ben B. wrote:The move that would make the most sense in the world would be for Lebron to walk and join Miami. Someone joining Wade is the only way that 2 superstars will be united via FA, and they could retain Beasley & Chalmers plus any vet ring-chasers who might want to sign on for a year (maybe Camby, or maybe JON sticks around for the vet min?)

Obviously I hope that that doesn't happen. But if Lebron gets disgruntled playing with scrubs and feels content leaving $20-30 million on the table since he'll be earning hundreds of millions over his career, and if he wants to be in a sunny climate with beautiful women year-round, Miami seems like a logical choice. All other teams would be left scrambling madly just to stay barely competitive.

I would expect mass retirements from older guys who physically could stick it out a year or two longer but who instead look at Dwyane and Lebron and say, "why bother?" :lol:


This. I might cry if it happens. Its a very legit possibility
montestewart wrote:Blatche and McGee standing next to Boozer and Thomas reminded me of first-time offenders meeting real cons in a "scared straight" program.
.
User avatar
Neusch23
Head Coach
Posts: 7,250
And1: 59
Joined: Jul 04, 2005
Location: Green Bay
     

Re: ESPN: Teams In the 2010 Hunt 

Post#13 » by Neusch23 » Fri Oct 30, 2009 10:06 pm

one thing I have noticed is that the major market teams have been able to clear the cap space needed. The lakers are already young, and set, but you still have the clipps there, Chicago, NJ and NY. All big markets especially if new jersey moves to brooklyn. It was like the little guys said, "we don't have a shot, you big kids fight this out"
boogydown
Banned User
Posts: 26,221
And1: 15
Joined: Dec 14, 2004

Re: ESPN: Teams In the 2010 Hunt 

Post#14 » by boogydown » Fri Oct 30, 2009 10:24 pm

Sounds about right. They are not factoring in that Tyrus can come off the books which is around 7M and Salmons which is another 6M. They also are not factoring in opt out for other teams, and also non guaranteed contracts.

Miami is the only team that can sign two max FA's. Teams can take a pay cut and sign for a little less two close to max contracts in New Jersey.

So in essence Chicago has enough to sign one max FA. We cannot S&T Salmons if we waive his rights. We can however wait until I believe the deadline date which is around July 10 to July 17 (someone confirm this), before we waive Salmons and Tyrus rights so that way if we know for sure we aren't getting a better free agent, there will be no reason to waive their rights. At that point, we can either S&T them, or resign those guys along with a player worth around 13 million. That includes say
Rudy Gay, Carlos Boozer etc.

We also will have the MLE to spend after that. So if we fail at 2010 summer free agency with Wade, Bosh, and Lebron as a max FA, then we'll likely be spending around that amount (13 million) for another decent free agent, and sign and trade whomever we need to after that.

You're also right above. Lebron joining Wade in Miami seems like the "easiest" thing to do. However with everything Cleveland has done for Lebron, I am not sure that will happen. With that said, Lebron knows what will happen staying in Cleveland, so meeting up in two locations could happen. Another possibility is all 3 join up in a single team, and the team S&T for the 3rd person. Example Scenario: Miami S&T Lebron, but sends Beasley to Cleveland, and then signs Bosh outright. Could be scary seeing

Chalmers
Wade
Lebron
Bosh
Filler

In a lineup. Miami is setting themselves up nicely, but unless they can attract a major 2010 free agent, they could pay the price losing Wade themselves. The same scenario could be setup for us which is why I have been wanting management to make a move before deadline acquiring a forward (Bosh, Amare, Boozer, Gay etc.) that can be moved for Tyrus, Hinrich, Deng that can come in before the playoffs. If we are able to acquire another player before deadline, it will be much more attractive knowing that anyone who signs in Chicago can easily join an instant contender, and that all we need is one player added to this team. Example Scenerio

Deng + Tyrus for Boozer + Harpring, then we sign Wade or Lebron

New Jersey is setting themselves up nicely as well with a new owner and Jay-Z. They also got lucky with Brook Lopez, Terrance Williams looks nice, and they have Devin Harris. All they need to do is bring Bosh and Lebron in, and they are set. With that said, they are still in New Jersey, and the team will be awful this season. I see this team more or less the odd team out right now.

New York doesn't stand a chance in my opinion. They won't be able to get the 3 major free agents but I could see them overpaying for players like Joe Johnson, Amare etc who will get the max from them.
User avatar
Addicted123
Starter
Posts: 2,130
And1: 22
Joined: Apr 15, 2005

Re: ESPN: Teams In the 2010 Hunt 

Post#15 » by Addicted123 » Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:56 pm

kodo wrote:It would be highly unusual for Salmons not to opt out, he's the remaining highest scorer on a playoff team, and he gets paid less than Chris Duhon. Even if it were not 2010, he'd still easily be able to make more than MLE. I think that's why most people are assuming a Salmons opt out in the salary estimations.


Also, if he doesn't opt out, he will be a year older when he enters the free agent market after the 10/11 season. Salmons is already getting up there in age (30 this December), so I'm sure that will hurt his value considerably. Salmons has to be thinking about locking his final multi-year deal that will take him to retirement.

Even if he gets less money in 10/11, there is value in locking up a multi-year deal.
User avatar
Addicted123
Starter
Posts: 2,130
And1: 22
Joined: Apr 15, 2005

Re: ESPN: Teams In the 2010 Hunt 

Post#16 » by Addicted123 » Sat Oct 31, 2009 12:00 am

sdeezy wrote:
Ben B. wrote:The move that would make the most sense in the world would be for Lebron to walk and join Miami. Someone joining Wade is the only way that 2 superstars will be united via FA, and they could retain Beasley & Chalmers plus any vet ring-chasers who might want to sign on for a year (maybe Camby, or maybe JON sticks around for the vet min?)

Obviously I hope that that doesn't happen. But if Lebron gets disgruntled playing with scrubs and feels content leaving $20-30 million on the table since he'll be earning hundreds of millions over his career, and if he wants to be in a sunny climate with beautiful women year-round, Miami seems like a logical choice. All other teams would be left scrambling madly just to stay barely competitive.

I would expect mass retirements from older guys who physically could stick it out a year or two longer but who instead look at Dwyane and Lebron and say, "why bother?" :lol:


This. I might cry if it happens. Its a very legit possibility


And, of course, the much discussed "no state taxes" in Florida helps bring the contract $$$s lost to a smaller amount.

If I was Lebron, I would definitely leave Cleveland. It's not like Cleveland has a nucleus of talented young players around him.
boogydown
Banned User
Posts: 26,221
And1: 15
Joined: Dec 14, 2004

Re: ESPN: Teams In the 2010 Hunt 

Post#17 » by boogydown » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:08 am

I just see the more likely scenario is one of Bosh and Lebron joins Wade in Miami.

We will then have to either settle on the left over, overpay for another FA, settle on 1 or 2 medicore free agents, wait until 2011, or S&T for someone giving cap relief to the other team.
User avatar
The Force.
Head Coach
Posts: 7,199
And1: 2,112
Joined: May 30, 2008
Location: Chicago
Contact:

Re: ESPN: Teams In the 2010 Hunt 

Post#18 » by The Force. » Sat Oct 31, 2009 10:38 pm

Hold up, LeBron, Wade, AND Bosh???

*covers ears*

Lalalallalalalalala!!!!
Juicy Juice
Banned User
Posts: 812
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 08, 2009

Re: ESPN: Teams In the 2010 Hunt 

Post#19 » by Juicy Juice » Sat Oct 31, 2009 10:41 pm

Trade Deng and Thomas for Boozer, and keep Hinrich. Attempt to sign wade in 2010. Nothing in the NBA will be able to top a back court rotation of Rose/Wade/Hinrich.
User avatar
Ben
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,717
And1: 2,850
Joined: Feb 09, 2006

Re: ESPN: Teams In the 2010 Hunt 

Post#20 » by Ben » Sun Nov 1, 2009 12:29 am

The Force. wrote:Hold up, LeBron, Wade, AND Bosh???

*covers ears*

Lalalallalalalalala!!!!


No, he just said ONE of Lebron or Bosh. I would add Boozer to the list of Miami possibilities. Miami can't sign two max new FAs. Nobody can. But they have the big advantage of being able to RE-sign Wade and still sign one new max FA, which would give them two elite players.

If Lebron goes there, it's game over for the rest of the league. If Bosh does it'll be plenty bad, although they'll have to rely on Beasley being able to play SF (or just trade him for a promising center). Whatever the case, I give Miami much better odds than us of hitting a 2010 home run. NJ might have a better shot, too.

Return to Chicago Bulls