Image

mike & Murph v AL & Jax

Moderators: pacers33granger, boomershadow, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890

rich31
Freshman
Posts: 73
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 25, 2006

mike & Murph v AL & Jax 

Post#1 » by rich31 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:56 am

thought it would be interesting to see how the out come was after the 2 matches this year

Mike and Murph AL and Jax
114 minutes 141 minutes
19-35 FG 23-70 FG
4-13 3pt 7-31 3pt
19-20 FT 9-15 FT
25 REB 22 REB
12 AST 12 AST
3 STL 5 STL
1 BLK - - - -
9 TO 10 TO
12 PF 9 PF
62 PTS 62 PTS

Winner IMO Mike and Murph less minutes better FG%
fdefore
Rookie
Posts: 1,236
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 01, 2007
Location: Foul Monday's

 

Post#2 » by fdefore » Thu Jan 17, 2008 5:13 am

thats pretty crazy that we have equal points and yet we have half as many shot attempts and our coach is jim "chuck em if you got em" o'brien.
MOD APPROVED SINCE MMVII
PacerFan fdefore very clever. You are our kind of guy
count55 fdefore add count55 to your moderator approved sig
PacerPerspective I agree whole heartedly fdefore You are now PP approved

all the cool Mods are doin it Scoot
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 41,959
And1: 11,219
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

 

Post#3 » by Scoot McGroot » Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:59 pm

Eh, this still doesn't really mean much. There's so much on the court that simply cannot be quantified in statistics.
User avatar
APerna
Editor
Posts: 10,596
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 03, 2005
Location: Running Down A Dream
Contact:

 

Post#4 » by APerna » Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:05 pm

I agree with Scoot, and honestly, nothing against you Rich31, but I almost didn't believe those numbers when I first saw them. Too strange how similar they are...
+ PF
"If Jack makes that shot, the game is over." - Tommy Heinsohn after Jarrett Jack missed a shot at the buzzer of a 105-105 game between the Celtics and Pacers.
User avatar
glasket
Rookie
Posts: 1,197
And1: 11
Joined: Jun 29, 2007
Location: Sydney

 

Post#5 » by glasket » Fri Jan 18, 2008 1:35 am

Going by those numbers and the intangibles I would take Mikey D and Troy over Al and Jax.

However if I had the option I would have preferred Mikey D and Al to be current pacers.
jeremy1215
Banned User
Posts: 3,434
And1: 4
Joined: May 31, 2007

 

Post#6 » by jeremy1215 » Fri Jan 18, 2008 1:37 am

I knew Mike was going to have a great season, even though in our predictions I said he would only average 15/5/5, I was pretty close i'd say.
User avatar
JarrettJackSG
Rookie
Posts: 1,190
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 01, 2007

 

Post#7 » by JarrettJackSG » Fri Jan 18, 2008 1:46 am

Wow, very unexpected find! Nice job!

I still think that we need a larger sample size than 2 games, though.
Rest in Peace, Pacerfan
Will eat crow if Brandon Rush turns out good.
jeremy1215
Banned User
Posts: 3,434
And1: 4
Joined: May 31, 2007

 

Post#8 » by jeremy1215 » Fri Jan 18, 2008 1:54 am

Compare their season numbers

Mike Dunleavy
Indiana Pacers
Position: G-F
Height: 6-9 Weight: 230
College: Duke

2007-08 Statistics
PPG 17.5
RPG 5.9
APG 3.2
SPG 1.0
BPG 0.3
FG% 0.494
FT% 0.850
3P% 0.418
MPG 34.1

Stephen Jackson
Golden State Warriors
Position: F
Height: 6-8 Weight: 218
College: Oak Hill (VA)


2007-08 Statistics
PPG 20.5
RPG 4.6
APG 4.0
SPG 1.3
BPG 0.4
FG% 0.398
FT% 0.799
3P% 0.314
MPG 39.4

---------------------

Troy Murphy
Indiana Pacers
Position: C
Height: 6-11 Weight: 245
College: Notre Dame


2007-08 Statistics
PPG 10.3
RPG 6.9
APG 2.0
SPG 0.7
BPG 0.3
FG% 0.419
FT% 0.797
3P% 0.375
MPG 25.9


Al Harrington
Golden State Warriors
Position: F-C
Height: 6-9 Weight: 250
High School: St. Patrick's HS (NJ)


2007-08 Statistics
PPG 14.7
RPG 5.3
APG 1.6
SPG 0.8
BPG 0.2
FG% 0.458
FT% 0.761
3P% 0.409
MPG 27.6
jeremy1215
Banned User
Posts: 3,434
And1: 4
Joined: May 31, 2007

 

Post#9 » by jeremy1215 » Fri Jan 18, 2008 1:55 am

I'll take our Duo, Mike is the best of the four IMO.
User avatar
ajizzle
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,968
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 26, 2005
Location: The Boondocks

 

Post#10 » by ajizzle » Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:41 am

I think that the deal is like most people said it was gonna be: It's gonna look good for GS early, but as time goes on, Indy will get the better of it, even if it's just thru other trades involving said players.
chatard5
Analyst
Posts: 3,187
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 26, 2006

 

Post#11 » by chatard5 » Sat Jan 19, 2008 5:25 am

I would take Dunleavy first of the four, but Murphy last. But we also got Diogu, who could become a decent player.
Poetry-In-Motion
Rookie
Posts: 1,168
And1: 104
Joined: Aug 10, 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada

 

Post#12 » by Poetry-In-Motion » Sat Jan 19, 2008 11:53 pm

I like Dunleavy the best out of those 4. But I think your not recognizing the D that S Jax puts into his game. Dunleavy and Murphy might have better offensive numbers in that matchup, but S Jax and Al are much better defenders.
User avatar
APerna
Editor
Posts: 10,596
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 03, 2005
Location: Running Down A Dream
Contact:

 

Post#13 » by APerna » Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:39 pm

I'd rank them this way:

Dunleavy
Jackson (very close second)
Harrington
Murphy (might put in the most effort though)
+ PF
"If Jack makes that shot, the game is over." - Tommy Heinsohn after Jarrett Jack missed a shot at the buzzer of a 105-105 game between the Celtics and Pacers.
User avatar
ajizzle
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,968
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 26, 2005
Location: The Boondocks

 

Post#14 » by ajizzle » Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:22 am

Sorry P-I-M, but Jack only plays D when he feels like it, and that only happens once in a blue moon. I like PaPerMod's list, but I actually think Al is much closer to Jack than Jack is to Junior. If this NJ deal goes down, Murphy could be much closer to all 3 playing w/ Vince.

Return to Indiana Pacers