Clarkson to Sacramento
Moderators: Trader_Joe, loserX, Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Clarkson to Sacramento
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,171
- And1: 14,380
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Los Angeles
Clarkson to Sacramento
If Monk leaves ...
SAC trades: Sasha Vezenkov, Davion Mitchell, 2025 POR 2nd
UTA trades: Jordan Clarkson
Utah sends Clarkson to a good team, gets a young player to look at, adds a veteran shooter who can probably be flipped for a 2nd, and adds a nice 2nd.
Sacramento replaces Monk without giving up premium assets.
SAC trades: Sasha Vezenkov, Davion Mitchell, 2025 POR 2nd
UTA trades: Jordan Clarkson
Utah sends Clarkson to a good team, gets a young player to look at, adds a veteran shooter who can probably be flipped for a 2nd, and adds a nice 2nd.
Sacramento replaces Monk without giving up premium assets.
JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: Clarkson to Sacramento
- K_chile22
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,842
- And1: 7,957
- Joined: Jul 15, 2015
Re: Clarkson to Sacramento
I don't think Clarkson has much value at all coming off the season he just had at 31 to be honest
Re: Clarkson to Sacramento
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,805
- And1: 1,137
- Joined: Jan 15, 2015
Re: Clarkson to Sacramento
I do like this for both teams, but wouldn't Kings rather pay what Clarkson earns to keep Monk? I'm not sure Monk will get bigger than 20M per year offers. I'd rather have monk at 20M than Clarkson today
Re: Clarkson to Sacramento
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,628
- And1: 836
- Joined: May 19, 2023
Re: Clarkson to Sacramento
tcheco wrote:I do like this for both teams, but wouldn't Kings rather pay what Clarkson earns to keep Monk? I'm not sure Monk will get bigger than 20M per year offers. I'd rather have monk at 20M than Clarkson today
Clarkson's contract is 2/28.3m and Monk will probably get closer to 3/60.
Re: Clarkson to Sacramento
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 54,003
- And1: 32,488
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: Clarkson to Sacramento
I don't think Clarkson has positive trade value. The Jazz shouldn't have extended him above the taxMLE.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Clarkson to Sacramento
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,645
- And1: 7,309
- Joined: Apr 15, 2020
Re: Clarkson to Sacramento
This would be a sneaky good move for Utah.
Re: Clarkson to Sacramento
-
- Junior
- Posts: 262
- And1: 234
- Joined: Aug 02, 2022
Re: Clarkson to Sacramento
I think clarkson is a negative contract. Soon to be 32, has always had mediocre efficiency and it's only getting worse from here and is one of the worst defenders in the league. If they're trying to replace monk in this situation they should just pay more for sexton
Re: Clarkson to Sacramento
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,805
- And1: 1,137
- Joined: Jan 15, 2015
Re: Clarkson to Sacramento
HadAnEffectHere wrote:tcheco wrote:I do like this for both teams, but wouldn't Kings rather pay what Clarkson earns to keep Monk? I'm not sure Monk will get bigger than 20M per year offers. I'd rather have monk at 20M than Clarkson today
Clarkson's contract is 2/28.3m and Monk will probably get closer to 3/60.
Oh, my bad
Still, 3/60 still looks better I'd say, considering the range that Monk gives and Clarkson haven't(at least this year)
That 7M difference won't give the Kings the space to operate around I guess.
I like Clarkson, and at 13M he is a positive value, but Kings downgrade in talent nevertheless
Re: Clarkson to Sacramento
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,964
- And1: 10,605
- Joined: Sep 17, 2010
Re: Clarkson to Sacramento
Let's just expand the trade.
Collins + Clarkson for Huerter + Barnes + Sasha or Mitchell + Portland 2nd
I'd do that regardless if we resign Monk or not. I think Sac needs more guys who can create off the dribble and get their own shot.
Fox/Monk*/Mitchell
Keon/Clarkson/Colby
Keegan/
Collins/Lyles
Sabonis
George/
Sexton/Huerter
Barnes/Brice
Lauri/Hendricks/Sasha
Kessler
Collins + Clarkson for Huerter + Barnes + Sasha or Mitchell + Portland 2nd
I'd do that regardless if we resign Monk or not. I think Sac needs more guys who can create off the dribble and get their own shot.
Fox/Monk*/Mitchell
Keon/Clarkson/Colby
Keegan/
Collins/Lyles
Sabonis
George/
Sexton/Huerter
Barnes/Brice
Lauri/Hendricks/Sasha
Kessler
Re: Clarkson to Sacramento
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,946
- And1: 2,656
- Joined: Aug 09, 2017
Re: Clarkson to Sacramento
LightTheBeam wrote:Let's just expand the trade.
Collins + Clarkson for Huerter + Barnes + Sasha or Mitchell + Portland 2nd
I'd do that regardless if we resign Monk or not. I think Sac needs more guys who can create off the dribble and get their own shot.
Fox/Monk*/Mitchell
Keon/Clarkson/Colby
Keegan/
Collins/Lyles
Sabonis
George/
Sexton/Huerter
Barnes/Brice
Lauri/Hendricks/Sasha
Kessler
Would both sides do that?
Re: Clarkson to Sacramento
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,121
- And1: 4,042
- Joined: Jun 12, 2003
Re: Clarkson to Sacramento
NYG wrote:LightTheBeam wrote:Let's just expand the trade.
Collins + Clarkson for Huerter + Barnes + Sasha or Mitchell + Portland 2nd
I'd do that regardless if we resign Monk or not. I think Sac needs more guys who can create off the dribble and get their own shot.
Fox/Monk*/Mitchell
Keon/Clarkson/Colby
Keegan/
Collins/Lyles
Sabonis
George/
Sexton/Huerter
Barnes/Brice
Lauri/Hendricks/Sasha
Kessler
Would both sides do that?
I think Ainge might try to extract another SRP but it looks pretty good. I'm also assuming Utah might trade several more of their vets to be legitimately bad next season ahead of the '25 draft. Clarkson had a rough season overall but was playing really well when put back in his 6th man role before "the injuries/tank". He even had a triple double off the bench when the team was actually rolling before the deadline. Neither Clarkson or Collins are good defenders but I do think we haven't really seen the best of Collins yet either and he's still only 26. Playing next to Sabonis, instead of Kessler or Capela, might open up more in his game. Utah has had to play him as a small ball 5 but I do think there is still potential for him to thrive at PF if he's playing next to a big who can pass, shoot, and alter shots.
Of course the Kings should try to keep Monk but I'm not paying him more than 3/$60 mil.
Re: Clarkson to Sacramento
- Chuck Everett
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,825
- And1: 12,514
- Joined: May 28, 2004
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: Clarkson to Sacramento
Clarkson is also a perpetual heat check guy. Just shooting at random times, not running the offense. I don't think he would work in Sacto playing off Fox and Sabonis. One of the best parts of Malik Monk's game is that he can play on and off the ball. Lobs, in transition, catch and shoot, pin downs. He has turned into a really good NBA player.
"Kill 'em with Grindness."
Re: Clarkson to Sacramento
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,044
- And1: 2,167
- Joined: May 17, 2022
- Contact:
Re: Clarkson to Sacramento
I wouldn't do this with any of the parts from Sacramento. Not a fan of how inefficient Clarkson is.
Re: Clarkson to Sacramento
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,518
- And1: 10,420
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
Re: Clarkson to Sacramento
i have the pick going the wrong way
Re: Clarkson to Sacramento
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 217
- And1: 215
- Joined: Apr 10, 2015
Re: Clarkson to Sacramento
LightTheBeam wrote:Let's just expand the trade.
Collins + Clarkson for Huerter + Barnes + Sasha or Mitchell + Portland 2nd
I'd do that regardless if we resign Monk or not. I think Sac needs more guys who can create off the dribble and get their own shot.
Fox/Monk*/Mitchell
Keon/Clarkson/Colby
Keegan/
Collins/Lyles
Sabonis
George/
Sexton/Huerter
Barnes/Brice
Lauri/Hendricks/Sasha
Kessler
Jazz should definitely do that. They need a hard reset, and Clarkson and Collins are just not in their future.
Return to Trades and Transactions