ImageImage

OT: Biedrins to get $63m/6years

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis

User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 61,064
And1: 26,315
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: OT: Biedrins to get $63m/6years 

Post#41 » by paulpressey25 » Tue Jul 29, 2008 12:58 pm

GrandAdmiralDan wrote:Biedrins actually will have a base salary of $54 mil over 6 years,.


So in reality we all need to repost since Biedrins got a significantly lesser deal than Bogut. At least on the guaranteed money portion. And his was a flat salary at $9mm per.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
GrandAdmiralDan
RealGM
Posts: 15,107
And1: 1,293
Joined: Jul 24, 2004
Location: New Berlin, WI (Milwaukee)
Contact:
     

Re: OT: Biedrins to get $63m/6years 

Post#42 » by GrandAdmiralDan » Tue Jul 29, 2008 1:07 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:
GrandAdmiralDan wrote:Biedrins actually will have a base salary of $54 mil over 6 years,.


So in reality we all need to repost since Biedrins got a significantly lesser deal than Bogut. At least on the guaranteed money portion. And his was a flat salary at $9mm per.


I suppose.

But are you implying the flat contract for Biedrins is a good thing?
That is not the case at all when you pair it with a player option and/or ETO
Biedrins got a flat contract AND a player option. As I explained, that is not a good thing for the Warriors, it is a good thing for Biedrins.

It allows him to take more of the total contract value before becoming a free agent again if he is at all worth that kind of money. With a standard escalating contract, a player who chooses not to exercise his player option is missing out on a larger percentage of their total contract value by making that decision.
97-98
Nick Van Exel (LAL) on defending the Stockton-Malone pick-and-roll: "Yeah,
I got a way to defend it. Bring a bat to the game and kill one of them."

Return to Milwaukee Bucks