What could have been but thank god it wasn't

NBA Draft Report: Kel'el Ware Of Indiana

Kel'el Ware has stretch center potential, while also possessing a floor as a playable rim-runner, which says a lot about him as a prospect.

The Wolves Owned All 4,700 Basketball Squares

by John Wilmes

Minnesota's defensive effort in Game 2 was a transformative sight. In what appeared to be an effort to become one with their team name, they swarmed, smashed, hounded, snarled, took, and destroyed for 24 straight minutes to start the game. Not an inch of the court was safe.

NBA Draft Report: Devin Carter Of Providence

by Zachary Cohen

Devin Carter won't be a star, but he could certainly be a starter or high end rotation player with his ability on both ends of the floor and do all the little things.

Joel Embiid Is Already Legend

by John Wilmes

Joel Embiid carries the weight of expectations differently than others. As his fanbase and national media have constructed stories that have him as the potential messiah in a decade-long process of experimental team-building, coupled with the unusual rabidity of Philadelphia sports fans, he has accepted this role sincerely.

What could have been but thank god it wasn't

Bmoney: Senior; Posts: 656; And1: 0; Joined: Jul 22, 2001; Location: 5; Post #1 » by Bmoney » Sun Jan 6, 2008 9:17 am

What could have been but thank god it wasn't

Quote

Post #1 » by Bmoney » Sun Jan 6, 2008 9:17 am

All I have to say is THANK GOD KP traded ZACK cause if he was on this team they'd never win 15 of 16.

Good riddance!

:clap:

Frye is better than Zack baby & we got J.Jones too, what a genius move!

Top

Pattycakes: General Manager; Posts: 7,725; And1: 1,525; Joined: Nov 01, 2005; Contact:
Contact Pattycakes

Website; Post #2 » by Pattycakes » Sun Jan 6, 2008 10:36 am

Quote

Post #2 » by Pattycakes » Sun Jan 6, 2008 10:36 am

Qft..?

Top

Yadadimean: Analyst; Posts: 3,407; And1: 76; Joined: Mar 02, 2006; Location: Oakland; Post #3 » by Yadadimean » Sun Jan 6, 2008 1:17 pm

Quote

Post #3 » by Yadadimean » Sun Jan 6, 2008 1:17 pm

QFT!!!!!!!!!! curse words curse word!!!!!!!! WE GIOT GREG ODEN!!!!! drunk post#2

Signature

Top

Goldbum: Analyst; Posts: 3,231; And1: 544; Joined: Jul 12, 2001; Location: Salt Lake City, Utah; Post #4 » by Goldbum » Sun Jan 6, 2008 9:15 pm

Quote

Post #4 » by Goldbum » Sun Jan 6, 2008 9:15 pm

Frye is not better than Zach. Zach has never been used properly in NY.

From Portland to Reno to Vegas to LA to SLC and on to HotLanta. Winning at life. Too Blessed to be Stressed

Top

Walton'sBeard!: Lead Assistant; Posts: 4,618; And1: 0; Joined: Jun 14, 2007; Location: RIP hopes and dreams of Blazer fans; Post #5 » by Walton'sBeard! » Sun Jan 6, 2008 9:24 pm

Quote

Post #5 » by Walton'sBeard! » Sun Jan 6, 2008 9:24 pm

To me, it depends on your definition of "better". If we are talking about stats, then yes Zach is much better. But if we are talking about value to a team then Frye is better. Zach has a negative impact on any team he'd ever play for while Frye has a small positive impact. By my definition of better, Frye is better. But this argument is so 7 months ago.

Top

Milkdud: RealGM; Posts: 12,095; And1: 137; Joined: May 21, 2001; Location: Dreaming of Australia; Post #6 » by Milkdud » Sun Jan 6, 2008 9:33 pm

Quote

Post #6 » by Milkdud » Sun Jan 6, 2008 9:33 pm

Frye's impact on our team is better since he allows LA to be one of the blazers offensive focal points. That was not gonna happen as long as Z-Bo was around. But if you were just matching the 2 up in terms to talent Zach is clearly a better players both offensively and rebounding aspect... Frye might be better on D if at all its marginal.

Top