enigmatics wrote:Calvin Klein wrote:RaisingArizona wrote:Someone just said Sarver was better than Ish? I guess him dismantling a potential dynasty all to save a penny was forgotten? How about him trying to move the Suns from Phoenix? Revisionist history. This place has become worse than this team.
Both are awful. There's no need to defend one over the other.
Sarver was crass but he learned from his mistakes. It was night and day with him compared to what he was like early on as the owner.
It's just funny to me now - because most of the fan base was blood thirsty to replace him with a big spender owner. They got one and now so many are like "Oh I didn't mean THAT kind of big spender." So convenient.
By big spender we didn't mean also get rid of all future assets in the process. Big spender doesn't automatically mean "I'm completely incompetent".