europa wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Depends on the week of the season. Early in the season, they looked brilliant. Then the Saints looked smart again when Bush had a good stretch of games. Then the Titans looked like they got the best guy and now it looks like maybe the Texans did. I don't think we've answered that one by any means although I do think we can safely say Bush hasn't turned out to be the slam-dunk superstar he was projected to be and that's opened the door for Williams and Young to enter the discussion.
Speaking of Bush, I'm not sure whether he should be given props or not for maybe being engaged to Kim Kardashian. This guy could get any chick he wants and he's diving into those muddy waters?
Not turn this into a football thread, but i really doubt that Reggie Bush ever matches the hype he received. He doesn't run well enough between the tackles to be an every down 25 carries back. Williams is becoming the beast that his freak of nature size/speed/skills ratio said he might.
Young is still a bit of a wildcard in that debate, but i highly question if he'll ever pass well enough to be a great QB.
Like i said before, i understand why we chose Bogut and supported his choice, but i was wrong and so was Harris. To bad LH misjudged how good Bogut would become and just how good Paul would become. It would have taken some serious nads to draft Paul while we had TJ/Mo, but he'd look brilliant now if Harris did exactly that.