Reading the headlines today, it did occur to me that we haven't yet done that and it is long overdue... not only did he win 11 championships in 13 seasons as the team's most valuable player, but he won 2 of his final championships as a player/coach for Boston as well.
Boston loves Larry Bird, and it's well deserved, but Russell's impact on the history of the Celtics is unparalleled by any player to put on the team's uniform.
Let's get this man a statue....
PS: Not only that, but the Defensive Player of the Year Award should be named after him as well.
What HASN'T Boston built a statue for Russell?
Moderators: bisme37, canman1971, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Froob, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman
What HASN'T Boston built a statue for Russell?
-
tlee324
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 19,954
- And1: 8,381
- Joined: Jun 29, 2003
- Location: Celtic Nation
-
-
GreenGrizz
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,466
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 23, 2005
- Location: Vermont
-
tlee324
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 19,954
- And1: 8,381
- Joined: Jun 29, 2003
- Location: Celtic Nation
-
GreenGrizz wrote:Wyc would have loved this idea.
Did you mean "Red" would have loved the idea?
Speaking of which, in response to the other post... don't they have a statue of Red at Quincy Market? It doesn't have to be at the Garden (although that's where it should be), it could be anywhere significant in Boston. It just needs to be there, in its glory, for all of us Celtic fans to see.
staue of russell
-
sox839
- Senior
- Posts: 575
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jan 12, 2003
staue of russell
A few years ago i wrote an email to the globe about this. It is absurd that there isn't something for him. There is a Red Auerbach statue in quincy market along with a of a replica pair of sneakers which are like birds witha small plaque. there is also a wood statue of Bird in the new england sports museum. Russell should have something. Perhapsnext to redsstatue or better yet how about in city hall plaza.
-
I love heinsohn
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 4,290
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 03, 2001
- Location: Green 17!
- Contact:
-
GonzoLays
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,092
- And1: 185
- Joined: Jun 16, 2003
- Location: The strongest man is he who stands alone in the face of oppression and censorship.
-
Not to get off topic here, but has anyone seen basketball from the 60's? My god, they look like they have no idea what they are doing.
I watched some classic games and I saw a sequence go like this:
* Cousy gets the ball, flips it behind his back to Heinson. Heinson flips the ball over his shoulder into the middle of the court (where the three point line would) to nobody in particular. Jerry West gets the ball and dribbles off his foot.
Next Sequence:
* No defense being played (im talking about HUGE CUSHIONS between the defender and offensive player)...Satch Sanders shoots an ugly airball, Heinson gets the ball and turns it over. Lakers rush back down court with their funky dribbling style, no offensive set, and just shoot. They miss....repeat all over again.
Basketball SUCKED backed then. A TON of guys in the league that should not have played because the NBA was not exactly an equal opportunity employer back then. Brutal.
I watched some classic games and I saw a sequence go like this:
* Cousy gets the ball, flips it behind his back to Heinson. Heinson flips the ball over his shoulder into the middle of the court (where the three point line would) to nobody in particular. Jerry West gets the ball and dribbles off his foot.
Next Sequence:
* No defense being played (im talking about HUGE CUSHIONS between the defender and offensive player)...Satch Sanders shoots an ugly airball, Heinson gets the ball and turns it over. Lakers rush back down court with their funky dribbling style, no offensive set, and just shoot. They miss....repeat all over again.
Basketball SUCKED backed then. A TON of guys in the league that should not have played because the NBA was not exactly an equal opportunity employer back then. Brutal.
-
BigHands
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,544
- And1: 126
- Joined: Aug 16, 2003
- Location: On the bow contemplating the grandeur of the iceberg
Russell was his own man from the start and lived life on his own terms. He has said more than once that Red Auerbach's approach gave him the freedom to be just himself and that it is most unlikely he would have achieved anything like what he did under a different coach.
One implication is that his relationship with the media was always strained. They were always there, always looking for an angle, but to Russell they were shallow, intrusive, and only incidental to what he sought to achieve.
Despite needing the money he later got out of broadcasting because of its inevitable sound-bite approach. Rick Barry's infamous "watermelon grin" comment on national TV was an example of what Russell fought his whole life and the fact that Barry was allowed to slide by that was an example of the crap Russell hated.
There was racism of course, and the media seldom, if ever, held white racists responsible, but the problem was more than that. Ted Williams had many of the same problems for some of the same reasons.
Like the Cleveland Browns great running back Jim Brown, Russell wanted no part of role model game the media likes to play. He did not sign autographs and he did not make nice as a public figure even though he got along fine with his peers.
It was the 60's and black people were often angry....and high levels of integrity and self-respect often increased that anger....Jim Brown took a similar stance, as did John Carlos, and in his own way so did Muhammad Ali - although Ali, patterned after Jack Johnson, was willing to provide the show media outlets need.
For example, were Russell playing today and had the same attitude he would probably refuse to travel to the local schools with a bunch of NBA players who cut more classes than they attended and preach the value of reading to kids.
The hypocrisy just would not fly with him and both the NBA and the press would disturbed at his unwillingness to help sell the league to the public.
So the media resented Russell and the feeling was mutual.
Russell did not attend when his number was retired and he did not attend when he was inducted into the Hall of Fame.
Like many people (Ted Williams included) Russell mellowed with age and there might be a statue of him at some point.
But the lack of one at present is as much Russell's responsibility as anyone else's.
And while he certainly deserves public recognition, it should not be forgotten that Russell was about the team and its successes. Some sort of monument to the whole roster of the period with Russell's image playing the leading role would actually be more appropriate.
One implication is that his relationship with the media was always strained. They were always there, always looking for an angle, but to Russell they were shallow, intrusive, and only incidental to what he sought to achieve.
Despite needing the money he later got out of broadcasting because of its inevitable sound-bite approach. Rick Barry's infamous "watermelon grin" comment on national TV was an example of what Russell fought his whole life and the fact that Barry was allowed to slide by that was an example of the crap Russell hated.
There was racism of course, and the media seldom, if ever, held white racists responsible, but the problem was more than that. Ted Williams had many of the same problems for some of the same reasons.
Like the Cleveland Browns great running back Jim Brown, Russell wanted no part of role model game the media likes to play. He did not sign autographs and he did not make nice as a public figure even though he got along fine with his peers.
It was the 60's and black people were often angry....and high levels of integrity and self-respect often increased that anger....Jim Brown took a similar stance, as did John Carlos, and in his own way so did Muhammad Ali - although Ali, patterned after Jack Johnson, was willing to provide the show media outlets need.
For example, were Russell playing today and had the same attitude he would probably refuse to travel to the local schools with a bunch of NBA players who cut more classes than they attended and preach the value of reading to kids.
The hypocrisy just would not fly with him and both the NBA and the press would disturbed at his unwillingness to help sell the league to the public.
So the media resented Russell and the feeling was mutual.
Russell did not attend when his number was retired and he did not attend when he was inducted into the Hall of Fame.
Like many people (Ted Williams included) Russell mellowed with age and there might be a statue of him at some point.
But the lack of one at present is as much Russell's responsibility as anyone else's.
And while he certainly deserves public recognition, it should not be forgotten that Russell was about the team and its successes. Some sort of monument to the whole roster of the period with Russell's image playing the leading role would actually be more appropriate.
"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it." - Mark Twain
-
GonzoLays
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,092
- And1: 185
- Joined: Jun 16, 2003
- Location: The strongest man is he who stands alone in the face of oppression and censorship.
-
BigHands wrote:Russell was his own man from the start and lived life on his own terms. He has said more than once that Red Auerbach's approach gave him the freedom to be just himself and that it is most unlikely he would have achieved anything like what he did under a different coach.
One implication is that his relationship with the media was always strained. They were always there, always looking for an angle, but to Russell they were shallow, intrusive, and only incidental to what he sought to achieve.
Despite needing the money he later got out of broadcasting because of its inevitable sound-bite approach. Rick Barry's infamous "watermelon grin" comment on national TV was an example of what Russell fought his whole life and the fact that Barry was allowed to slide by that was an example of the crap Russell hated.
There was racism of course, and the media seldom, if ever, held white racists responsible, but the problem was more than that. Ted Williams had many of the same problems for some of the same reasons.
Like the Cleveland Browns great running back Jim Brown, Russell wanted no part of role model game the media likes to play. He did not sign autographs and he did not make nice as a public figure even though he got along fine with his peers.
It was the 60's and black people were often angry....and high levels of integrity and self-respect often increased that anger....Jim Brown took a similar stance, as did John Carlos, and in his own way so did Muhammad Ali - although Ali, patterned after Jack Johnson, was willing to provide the show media outlets need.
For example, were Russell playing today and had the same attitude he would probably refuse to travel to the local schools with a bunch of NBA players who cut more classes than they attended and preach the value of reading to kids.
The hypocrisy just would not fly with him and both the NBA and the press would disturbed at his unwillingness to help sell the league to the public.
So the media resented Russell and the feeling was mutual.
Russell did not attend when his number was retired and he did not attend when he was inducted into the Hall of Fame.
Like many people (Ted Williams included) Russell mellowed with age and there might be a statue of him at some point.
But the lack of one at present is as much Russell's responsibility as anyone else's.
And while he certainly deserves public recognition, it should not be forgotten that Russell was about the team and its successes. Some sort of monument to the whole roster of the period with Russell's image playing the leading role would actually be more appropriate.
Greatest post ever? I felt like I was reading a book.
I want more...
-
meatball sub
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,456
- And1: 8,890
- Joined: May 28, 2004
- Location: in your mouth
-
BigHands
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,544
- And1: 126
- Joined: Aug 16, 2003
- Location: On the bow contemplating the grandeur of the iceberg
Russell played in a game 7 ten times.....here a sports writer ranks his performances
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/playoffs2 ... id=2453844
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/playoffs2 ... id=2453844
"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it." - Mark Twain
-
BigHands
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,544
- And1: 126
- Joined: Aug 16, 2003
- Location: On the bow contemplating the grandeur of the iceberg
-
ArmstrongInGreen
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 956
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 26, 2006
- Location: right behind you
GonzoLays wrote:Not to get off topic here, but has anyone seen basketball from the 60's? My god, they look like they have no idea what they are doing.
I watched some classic games and I saw a sequence go like this:
* Cousy gets the ball, flips it behind his back to Heinson. Heinson flips the ball over his shoulder into the middle of the court (where the three point line would) to nobody in particular. Jerry West gets the ball and dribbles off his foot.
Next Sequence:
* No defense being played (im talking about HUGE CUSHIONS between the defender and offensive player)...Satch Sanders shoots an ugly airball, Heinson gets the ball and turns it over. Lakers rush back down court with their funky dribbling style, no offensive set, and just shoot. They miss....repeat all over again.
Basketball SUCKED backed then. A TON of guys in the league that should not have played because the NBA was not exactly an equal opportunity employer back then. Brutal.
Gonzo, i dunno if you noticed but back in those days refs would call a foul on a defensive player if you even so much as TOUCHED the person with the ball. back then the game was officiated much more strictly, things have changed a lot in the nba...