theanimal23 wrote:It can July 1st. The Rockets and Grizzlies waited till July to finalize the Battier for Swift and Gay deal.
No, it doesn't even work then. The salaries don't match up.
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
theanimal23 wrote:It can July 1st. The Rockets and Grizzlies waited till July to finalize the Battier for Swift and Gay deal.
Will Perdude wrote:I want Kirk as our starting point, and I think Skiles does too. Put me down with Europa as a guy who would like this deal.
We would however, need to make 2 or 3 other moves. As our bench would be the worst in the league and a thorn in our side.
carmelbrownqueen wrote:Stuff like this is delicate info and throwing out a clue for someone to speculate on is different from emailing the details to everyone who requests it. Too many people received an email about this and then someone posted it on the boards, and then people started responding too it and pretty much confirming whether parts were true or not based on their answer.. that's not cool at all. People can lose jobs over stuff like this, it's not something to be taken lightly.
oshmeehan wrote:Get off that cloud you're on
Its like you think your opinion matters more than others because the 'connections' you have and you've been here awhile posting
And please, if someone lost their job over this its their own fault then. Don't drop any clues or say something may be brewing then you don't have to worry about losing your job and it would also solve the problem of all this speculating from people that is going on
SupremeHustle wrote:Salmons might shoot us out of games, but SJAX shoots people out of parking lots. Think about it.
I understand your point, but why would anyone risk their job if they tell someone when they where ask not too?carmelbrownqueen wrote:Stuff like this is delicate info and throwing out a clue for someone to speculate on is different from emailing the details to everyone who requests it. Too many people received an email about this and then someone posted it on the boards, and then people started responding too it and pretty much confirming whether parts were true or not based on their answer.. that's not cool at all. People can lose jobs over stuff like this, it's not something to be taken lightly.
bango_the_buck wrote:theanimal23 wrote:It can July 1st. The Rockets and Grizzlies waited till July to finalize the Battier for Swift and Gay deal.
No, it doesn't even work then. The salaries don't match up.
bango_the_buck wrote:theanimal23 wrote:It can July 1st. The Rockets and Grizzlies waited till July to finalize the Battier for Swift and Gay deal.
No, it doesn't even work then. The salaries don't match up.
RyGuy24 wrote:I'm the last guy to ask about salary things, but won't next seasons salaries be used on July 1st?
Hinrich makes 10 mill, and CV+Mason add up to 9 mill.
I could be wrong though, so somebody correct me if that's the case. Thanks.
edit: animal beat me
Thanks, that's exactly what I am saying.. I understand fully that everyone wants to know, this is an exciting part of the season when the draft comes around and trades are rumored around every corner. He gave us a nibble of what he heard when he typed Kirk's name and we needed to leave it there, speculate on stuff and that was it... having the details all but confirmed for any and everyone to read on a website is just not cool at all. Let's not act like in the past the Bucks organization didn't find out that details had been spilled to a certain poster and shared with the boards before.. because that did happen and part of bringing in new blood to the management office is to keep more things under wraps.Balls2TheWalls wrote:oshmeehan wrote:Get off that cloud you're on
Its like you think your opinion matters more than others because the 'connections' you have and you've been here awhile posting
And please, if someone lost their job over this its their own fault then. Don't drop any clues or say something may be brewing then you don't have to worry about losing your job and it would also solve the problem of all this speculating from people that is going on
I find the "We can't deal with people going neener neener neener" defense is weak. I think that what CBQ is asking for is that the people entrusted with information to act professional with the entrusted information.
I am inferring that she is also hoping that people would not act like children when they blurted a secret out like children. You might not like that you weren't in the know, but if someone was messing around with your job, you would not find it funny.
SupremeHustle wrote:Salmons might shoot us out of games, but SJAX shoots people out of parking lots. Think about it.
paulpressey25 wrote:I agree with Debt....
I do not like wasting picks on just average players. The goal of the draft is finding above average talent or even superstars. Niether Hinny or the 8th will most likely will not help the Bucks next year, so why throw away a chance of getting a more talented player. Even most Bulls fans are saying sure to the trade, but why would we do it?steger_3434 wrote:msiris wrote:No way I do this deal. Helping the Bulls who already have the 1st pick is a joke. No way does this improve the team. WAY too much to give up for A Hinny. If so no way does this team wins 20 games next year.
I'm sure we win more than 20, but it isn't a very good team.
Our PG position gets a little bit better
Our SG position stays the same
Our SF position gets worse. Yeah, dez isn't good, but having Simmons only is a joke
Our PF position gets worse. Yi may be a little better, but not having CV makes it worse
Our C position gets a little better as Bogut improves.
Our depth is atrocious.
The only way this team gets better is if Hammonds believe our core players from last year weren't as bad as they played and if he believes Skiles is the type of coach who he himself can win 10 games alone.
msiris wrote:I understand your point, but why would anyone risk their job if they tell someone when they where ask not too?carmelbrownqueen wrote:Stuff like this is delicate info and throwing out a clue for someone to speculate on is different from emailing the details to everyone who requests it. Too many people received an email about this and then someone posted it on the boards, and then people started responding too it and pretty much confirming whether parts were true or not based on their answer.. that's not cool at all. People can lose jobs over stuff like this, it's not something to be taken lightly.
trwi7 wrote:I also got this email.I just want to check the validity of this genius e-mail address.
And this one from the same guy.Gimme da trade rumor as well. Or else...
(Or else I will glue your eyes open and show you 5 hours of Tony Gwynn Jr. batting footage).