retrospect24 wrote:Warriors could use another center to replace Randolph.
this made me lol
Moderators: KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37
retrospect24 wrote:Warriors could use another center to replace Randolph.
Jellybeans8 wrote:PG-ELLIS
SG-CURRY
SF-WATSON
PF-MAGS
C-ROBINSON
el loco wrote:KeithMoonsLiver wrote:Dr Mufasa wrote:Would love to see him as a 6th man on a team like Boston, Cleveland, San Antonio. As long as he's only playing 15-20mpg he could be an excellent asset
lol, the problem is Nate is a loser and all those teams want to win. He cannot have a prominent role on a good team.
Sure he would/could. He would be a good backup push the pace type of player on a playoff caliber team in a limited minutes type of role.
el loco wrote:KeithMoonsLiver wrote:Dr Mufasa wrote:Would love to see him as a 6th man on a team like Boston, Cleveland, San Antonio. As long as he's only playing 15-20mpg he could be an excellent asset
lol, the problem is Nate is a loser and all those teams want to win. He cannot have a prominent role on a good team.
Sure he would/could. He would be a good backup push the pace type of player on a playoff caliber team in a limited minutes type of role.
KeithMoonsLiver wrote:el loco wrote:KeithMoonsLiver wrote:lol, the problem is Nate is a loser and all those teams want to win. He cannot have a prominent role on a good team.
Sure he would/could. He would be a good backup push the pace type of player on a playoff caliber team in a limited minutes type of role.
as long as by "limited minutes" you mean about 4 a game, sure
Please explain.......because at the moment it's pretty accurate............oh wait you're banking on the "we have the cash" theory.GalloFan22 wrote:iamworthy wrote:Knicks are setting themselves up for failure. Im going to laugh so hard when no one signs in NY!
??? this is so dumb in so many levels im just going to ignore it.
SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
GalloFan22 wrote:iamworthy wrote:Knicks are setting themselves up for failure. Im going to laugh so hard when no one signs in NY!
??? this is so dumb in so many levels im just going to ignore it.
DEEP3CL wrote:Please explain.......because at the moment it's pretty accurate............oh wait you're banking on the "we have the cash" theory.GalloFan22 wrote:iamworthy wrote:Knicks are setting themselves up for failure. Im going to laugh so hard when no one signs in NY!
??? this is so dumb in so many levels im just going to ignore it.
And you wonder why the Lakers are more valuable than the Knicks now?
Let me answer that............DYSFUNCTION.
Mars wrote:You can't stop the asterisk... you can only hope to contain it.
DEEP3CL wrote:Please explain.......because at the moment it's pretty accurate............oh wait you're banking on the "we have the cash" theory.GalloFan22 wrote:iamworthy wrote:Knicks are setting themselves up for failure. Im going to laugh so hard when no one signs in NY!
??? this is so dumb in so many levels im just going to ignore it.
And you wonder why the Lakers are more valuable than the Knicks now?
Let me answer that............DYSFUNCTION.
iamworthy wrote:Knicks are setting themselves up for failure. Im going to laugh so hard when no one signs in NY!
el loco wrote:Brunson2Spencer wrote:iamworthy wrote:Knicks are setting themselves up for failure. Im going to laugh so hard when no one signs in NY!
You realize Nate Robinson was a free agent this summer and didn't even get an offer from any team, right?
I think a few teams probably had an interest in him, but for what he was worth most assumed the knicks would match a small deal. David Lee was in the same boat.
MilanLakers wrote:I remember Mitch wanted to trade him for Farmar 1 or 2 years ago, well if the money is not that a big problem I think Lakers could make it a try.